this post was submitted on 14 Jun 2024
50 points (83.8% liked)
Technology
59422 readers
2973 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related content.
- Be excellent to each another!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
Approved Bots
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
You're correct, however if you've ever worked in a distribution center you'd know that single-operation dumb bots have limited usefulness. There's plenty of times when the product picker's task is: go to location, open case, take out product, place safely on pallet/wire rack/belt so that it won't get wrecked or dropped, scan data into needlessly complicated proprietary software that's not compatible with anything else, clean up after yourself (out the last guy), repeat.
There's a shocking amount of manual labor required in the industry that requires something like a person to do in distribution, just because it's too complicated and multifaceted for current machines to handle. My example didn't even cover half of the job.
Oh of course. My point wasn‘t that there‘s already easier ways to replace all workers. It was more about that humanoid robots sure ain‘t it. The upkeep cost and fail rates are way too high to be cost effective and we won‘t see more of them than small test facilities that only exist as a bad proof of concept to pressure employees.