this post was submitted on 15 Jun 2024
876 points (98.5% liked)

Funny

6900 readers
458 users here now

General rules:

Exceptions may be made at the discretion of the mods.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Shardikprime@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (10 children)

What?

I just want to point out that in the wedding illustration, that guy who gets thrown out it's not because he didn't put an effort dressing

He was thrown out because he he could not have got inside the building without the wedding garment

So he shouldn't be there

That's why they thrown him out

Because he was not recognized as being one of the invited AND chosen in any of the 3 rounds of invites that went out , the dude had to go.

The whole deal is basically telling people at the time that each rejected invitation made you part of his enemies, and even then if you tried to pass as if you had been invited and chosen, you'd be found out

[–] MacNCheezus 0 points 5 months ago (9 children)

Okay but it still roughly fits the situation in the OP, doesn't it? He got thrown out because he wasn't producing the expected result (i.e. being a proper wedding guest).

[–] Shardikprime@lemmy.world -1 points 5 months ago (3 children)

Nah, it's because he wasn't even supposed to be there. He was not chosen

[–] MacNCheezus 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Okay, then perhaps the guy in the OPs meme wasn't chosen either

[–] Shardikprime@lemmy.world -1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Probably, I don't understand the meme at all

[–] MacNCheezus 1 points 5 months ago

The meme is attempting to caricature Conservative’s idea of Jesus by alleging that the biblical Jesus would never put profit over people. But as the parables I mentioned show, that is in fact inaccurate and thus promotes a liberal caricature of Jesus who feeds people endlessly without ever asking for anything in return.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)