this post was submitted on 17 Jun 2024
516 points (99.2% liked)

Technology

59440 readers
3476 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] rottingleaf@lemmy.zip 11 points 5 months ago (3 children)

Why would they in the first place? What's wrong with a touchscreen menu to take an order?

Then, of course, I'm not sure such places fundamentally even need human personnel other than maintenance techs. Standard ingredients, prepackaged I think, standard hardware to cook, standard everything. It can just be a huge burger-selling machine with no human in sight.

[–] LordCrom@lemmy.world 7 points 5 months ago (2 children)

I personally HATE those places where you walk inside and you need to use the stupid touchscreen. I've asked someone to take my order, they say no. So I get in the car and go to the drive through where you still get a person taking your order.

[–] rottingleaf@lemmy.zip 1 points 5 months ago

What if there are physical buttons, like with ATMs?

[–] suction@lemmy.world 6 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Touchscreen? That's old, we can't use that in our marketing, even BK has those. We need something new, fuckin do I care if it works????

[–] rottingleaf@lemmy.zip 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

They could advertise actually usable physical buttons ...

[–] suction@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Those would stop working because local scoundrels would stick their chewing gums in them

[–] rottingleaf@lemmy.zip 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

With hercons without place to stick anything. Like a blister. You've seen such buttons.

[–] suction@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Those could work if it wasn’t for the local perverts blocking them 24/7 because twiddling them feels a bit like twiddling a robot’s nipples

[–] rottingleaf@lemmy.zip 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Never seen that. One can make them less like nipples and more like a depressable square area on a wall.

[–] suction@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

If it wasn’t for those Medellin kids who stole all the square shapes from the wall button factory, I tells ya

[–] tankplanker@lemmy.world 5 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Lots of their drive thrus use a person to take the order, and at a busy drive thru this becomes a dedicated person or persons just to take orders. If they can flip it to AI then they could open more lanes and reduce staff. Problem is that a skilled person is going to be better than AI over a shitty audio system, look at how Alexa and Siri struggle even when they have an optimized reception setup than the crappy setup you have at a drive thru with the person sitting inside their car, with music on and so on.

[–] rottingleaf@lemmy.zip 4 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Maybe voice interfaces are simply a fundamentally flawed idea. If one can extend a hand to take the package with the food, they can also push a few buttons. If those buttons are with hercons or such, they'll even last longer than consumer-grade touchscreens.

Of course it's easier when a human takes the order. But then if the cost of N screens with physical buttons is equal to that, one can make their order, say, N/2 times slower without any hurry and, well, the throughput should be higher still.

For drive thrus - that'd be M lanes with such terminals and a bit slower than M lanes with people. So - depends on how the cost of asphalt and space and people and terminals work economically.

What's definitely idiotic is to think one can replace a human with an "AI" without losing in efficiency. But then again, maybe it's worth it.

[–] tankplanker@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

While I like the ideas with screens, and fixed buttons even more so, they haven't gone with them despite the tech being available for a considerable time. I do wonder if its mostly down to how people use them rather than a limitation of the tech itself. Watch how many people nearly swipe or even do scrape exit parking machines, even simple parking meters stop working, people struggle to use the ones inside, then add in weather damage/proofing and vandalism and I would guess thats a big part of it. As its often a closed queue system any problem becomes a major issue almost instantly.

[–] rottingleaf@lemmy.zip 1 points 5 months ago

That applies to "AI" just as well.

[–] Potatos_are_not_friends@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago (1 children)

"I'm sorry, can you repeat that?"

"I'm sorry, can you repeat that?"

"I'm sorry, can you repeat that?"