this post was submitted on 19 Jun 2024
715 points (98.6% liked)

Technology

59317 readers
4683 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] zarenki@lemmy.ml 67 points 4 months ago (2 children)

This board has the StarFive JH7110 SoC. That processor has previously been in very low power single board computers like StarFive VisionFive 2 (2022) and Milk-V Mars (2023), a Raspberry Pi clone that can be bought for as low as $40. Its storage limitations (SD/eMMC rather than NVMe) show how much this isn't meant for laptop use.

Very underpowered for a laptop too, even when considering this is intended for developers and doesn't need to be remotely performance competitive. Consider that this has just 4 RV64GC cores, the cheapest Intel board options Framework offers are 12 cores (4P+8E), and any modern RISC-V core is far simpler with less area than even an Intel E core. These cores also lack the RISC-V vector instructions extension.

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 31 points 4 months ago (3 children)

Pine64 also has the Star64 as will, in 4GB and 8GB for $70 and $90 respectively. They're not exactly hard to find.

If I was developing for RISC-V, I'd buy one of those SBCs, not a Framework laptop. But it's cool that it exists, I suppose.

[–] barsoap@lemm.ee 11 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

You don't need a laptop to use a framework mainboard, they run without battery and display and everything. So if you have a Framework 13 or are in the market for one this might actually be a very nice thing, especially if the price is comparable to other boards.

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 2 points 4 months ago (2 children)

I guess? But why would you swap to RISC-V from their x86 boards? It'll be slower and less compatible.

I can see it for devs, but they're going to want a separate laptop or an SBC, they're not going to be swapping mainboards on the regular.

[–] lengau@midwest.social 7 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I'm considering it as a second laptop option, but I have a particular niche use case: I'm a developer who writes developer tools and is currently trying to ensure we have first-class RISC-V support.

This is probably what I'll go for if I buy in the next month though: https://liliputing.com/dc-roma-laptop-ii-packs-an-octa-core-risc-v-processor-16gb-of-ram-and-ubuntu-linux/

[–] barsoap@lemm.ee 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Hooking up a BananaPi to a keyboard+monitor is going to be quite a bit cheaper, and unlike with the framework laptop you can't re-use case, monitor, etc. with an upgraded board.

[–] lengau@midwest.social 2 points 4 months ago

It would, but I already have several dev boards I use in that configuration. What I'm looking for now is something I can take with me to use as a semi-daily driver so I can start reporting bugs in real world use cases.

[–] barsoap@lemm.ee 4 points 4 months ago

You can develop using it as an SBC, then put it into the laptop when you go to a conference to present your stuff. Or if you really want to code in the park it's not like it'd be a microcontroller, it is fast enough to run an editor and compiler.

But granted it's a hassle to switch out the mainboard. OTOH you can also use the x86 board as an SBC so when you're at home it doesn't really matter which board happens to be inside.

I guess from framework's POV there's not much of an argument, it's less "do people want potato laptops" but "do we want to get our feet wet with RISC-V and the SBC market". Nobody actually needs to use it in a laptop for the whole thing to make sense to them.

[–] utopiah@lemmy.world 5 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Indeed I bought a Banana Pi BPI-F3 with SpacemiT K1 8 core RISC-V chip,4G RAM and 16G eMMC https://www.banana-pi.org/en/banana-pi-sbcs/175.html for €95.89 including delivery. The form factor is nice though and I do enjoy Framework mission and partnerships. Depends what people need it for, good to have more options than aren't "just" SBC/devboards. I won't buy one now but I'll definitely keep it in mind.

Yup, I'm happy that it exists, I'm just not personality interested.

[–] zarenki@lemmy.ml 3 points 4 months ago

I bought a Milk-V Mars (4GB version) last year. Pi-like form factor and price seemed like an easy pick for dipping my toes into RISC-V development, and I paid US$49 plus shipping at the time. There's an 8GB version too but that was out of stock when I ordered.

If I wanted to spend more I'd personally prefer to put that budget toward a higher core system (for faster compile times) before any laptop parts, as either HDMI+USB or VNC would be plenty sufficient even if I did need to work on GUI things.

Other RISC-V laptops already are cheaper and with higher performance than this would be with Framework's shell+screen+battery, so I'm not sure what need this fills. If you intend to use the board in an alternate case without laptop parts you might as well buy an SBC instead.