this post was submitted on 21 Jun 2024
267 points (82.2% liked)

Asklemmy

43890 readers
740 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy ๐Ÿ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] random_character_a@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Never personally met an atheist that had found religion or heard about one, other than in American evangelical stories, but I've met a few non-religions people who have later in life found religion. Although I live in a quite atheaistic country, so there is a lack of peer pressure or need to talk about such things.

[โ€“] sanpedropeddler@sh.itjust.works -1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Never personally met an atheist that had found religion or heard about one

Well congratulations, now you have. It isn't quite as rare as you might think.

[โ€“] random_character_a@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago (1 children)

personally

Everyone is everything in the internetz.

[โ€“] sanpedropeddler@sh.itjust.works -1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

What about the internet makes this easier to lie about? I could tell you the same thing to your face and you still couldn't fact check it.

[โ€“] bionicjoey@lemmy.ca 3 points 4 months ago (1 children)

They aren't calling you a liar, they're saying they never met someone like that in person.

[โ€“] sanpedropeddler@sh.itjust.works -1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

They are drawing that distinction for a reason. They literally said everyone is everything on the internet. I don't how else you could possibly read that.

[โ€“] bionicjoey@lemmy.ca 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I read "everyone is everything on the internet" meaning you can always find someone who is anything, because the internet is just so big and diverse. Not as calling you a liar. Maybe I'm wrong, don't want to put words in their mouth. But that's how I read it.

[โ€“] sanpedropeddler@sh.itjust.works 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Maybe you're right, that sounds possible. I would think if that's their intention they wouldn't have written that "everyone" is everything, and would instead say "someone" or something to that effect. At that point I'm probably just overanalyzing though.

[โ€“] random_character_a@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

That was more a comment on obfuscation of the net. In internet you can just trow adjectives together and somebody will raise their hand, but you can never be sure if they are just putting on a role.

That makes more sense to me. Although, I would contend that people in real life can also just put on a role to varying degrees of success depending on the exact circumstances. Presumably when you said "personally" though, you meant people you already knew well enough to verify their claims to some extent.