this post was submitted on 26 Jun 2024
845 points (97.8% liked)

Technology

58306 readers
3189 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

GitCode, a git-hosting website operated Chongqing Open-Source Co-Creation Technology Co Ltd and with technical support from CSDN and Huawei Cloud.

It is being reported that many users' repository are being cloned and re-hosted on GitCode without explicit authorization.

There is also a thread on Ycombinator (archived link)

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 0x0@programming.dev 128 points 3 months ago (3 children)

The vast majority of projects on GitHub is open-source and forkable, why would that need authorization?

It's... suspicious that China's doing it en masse, but there's nothing wrong in cloning or forking a repo last i heard.

[–] passepartout@feddit.org 109 points 3 months ago (3 children)

It's not about authorization. They want to build a knowledge base for when the Great Firewall gets some more filters. Just like russias mirror of wikipedia which is heavily edited to discredit the west.

[–] FaceDeer@fedia.io 41 points 3 months ago (2 children)

And under copyleft licensing, they're allowed to do that. Both to GitHub repositories and Wikipedia.

[–] passepartout@feddit.org 38 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Of course they are, it's not like there is some kind of international jurisdiction anyway. What is bothersome is why they do it.

[–] acockworkorange@mander.xyz 2 points 3 months ago

Even if there was jurisdiction, anyone in the world is entitled to do it by the very licenses these works are released under.

[–] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 2 points 3 months ago

Hopefully they follow the rest of the stipulations of the licenses, such as the common one about keeping the license as such and contributing the changes back.

[–] 31337@sh.itjust.works 5 points 3 months ago

This seems like the most plausible explanation. Only other thing I can think of is they want to develop their own CoPilot (which I'm guessing isn't available in China due to the U.S. AI restrictions?), and they're just using their existing infrastructure to gather training data.

[–] Hello_there@fedia.io 15 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Open source? Or open source with a non-commercial restriction?

[–] FaceDeer@fedia.io 8 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Why would that matter? You can fork such projects too.

[–] Hello_there@fedia.io 4 points 3 months ago

Seems easier to commercialize a mirrored site?

[–] ifsocialismwasabear@lemmy.ml 13 points 3 months ago

Firewalls are already being built in america's internet with the ban of tiktok

As an european i do not see problem with having copies of free software in places not controlled by the monopoly microsoft is morphing to.