Linux

48335 readers

403 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Posts must be relevant to operating systems running the Linux kernel. GNU/Linux or otherwise.
No misinformation
No NSFW content
No hate speech, bigotry, etc

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

AgreeableLandscape@lemmy.ml

nooter692@lemmy.ml

MarcellusDrum@lemmy.ml

cypherpunks@lemmy.ml

cyclohexane@lemmy.ml

d3Xt3r@lemmy.nz

196

Moving away from RHEL based distros, whats good ? (lemmy.ml)

submitted 1 year ago by bzImage@lemmy.ml to c/linux@lemmy.ml

216 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Hi, mostly i use REHL based distros like Centos/Rocky/Oracle for the solutions i develop but it seems its time to leave..

What good server/minimal distro you use ?

Will start to test Debian stable.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Auli@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I don't understand what's happening at Red Hat. First they pull the codecs out of Fedora which is supposed to be a community distro so why are company lawyers involved? Now basically closing their source code. I mean technically not violating the GPL cause you only have to have your source available to your customers.

[–] OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 year ago

Codecs were never legal to include, community distro or not. The RedHat lawyers told Fedora that, and Fedora removed them

[–] knowncarbage@lemmy.fmhy.ml 3 points 1 year ago

Looks like this sort of thing: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Embrace,_extend,_and_extinguish

[–] thingsiplay@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Not really. Any customer can share GPL code, after they get it. Red Hat can't change that, if they use GPL. The issue is, from my understanding, that Red Hat can have some non GPL code to build the final product. So sharing the GPL code itself would not be enough to build a 1 to 1 binary compatible distribution.

At least at theory, because we don' know all details yet. Imagine a situation like the Chrome browser vs Chromium.