this post was submitted on 26 Jun 2024
119 points (95.4% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

5194 readers
1054 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world.  About 1C of total warming.  Second chart:  about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability.  Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases.  About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] silence7@slrpnk.net 18 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

Which is why the federal government is trying to buy concrete made in different ways that don't cause those emissions.

It's not at full scale yet, and won't be for some years. but it's how you actually solve that kind of problem without making peoples' lives worse.

[–] blazera@lemmy.world 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

This shit is like clean coal. Its not a thing, concrete production involves releasing the co2 from calcium carbonate, not even mentioning the heating and fuel requirements that go into that process. These highways are going to be built with conventional concrete.

[–] silence7@slrpnk.net 12 points 4 months ago (1 children)

The problem hasn't been "you can't do it" but "architects and engineers don't have enough experience with it to trust it, so they don't use it" — a federal government purchasing program can fix that.

[–] blazera@lemmy.world -3 points 4 months ago (1 children)

You literally cant do it, its a chemical reaction that outputs co2. In the same way you cant run a combustion engine without producing co2.

[–] silence7@slrpnk.net 10 points 4 months ago (1 children)

You can use a different chemistry to make a hard substance. There are a ton of options which look good in tests, and pretty much nobody uses them.

[–] blazera@lemmy.world -2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

You are reaching far too deep to try and imagine this somehow turning out alright for the climate. The hundreds of billions are budgeted already. Highway construction is happening. Conventional concrete is being used. Truck and SUV sales are increasing to fill the new highways.

[–] silence7@slrpnk.net 10 points 4 months ago

Vehicle sales remain below pre-pandemic levels

I don't deny that conventional concrete is still being used at scale. It's something like 1% of US emissions.