this post was submitted on 14 Aug 2023
202 points (94.7% liked)

Technology

34912 readers
113 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.


Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.


Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] FigMcLargeHuge@sh.itjust.works 30 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They seem to be getting a pass on using copyrighted materials to feed these programs so I am doubting that we would get legislation protecting our own likenesses, or those of our loved ones. I bet you couldn't even get lawmakers to understand what they would need to write into law. They (american lawmakers) all seem to be so up to speed on technology. /s

[–] otter@lemmy.ca 34 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Not until someone starts making clips of lawmakers narrating their own crimes and unethical behavior, then they'll get it done immediately.

Not that I'm suggesting anyone do that...

[–] FigMcLargeHuge@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I was thinking the same thing, or if a lawmakers granddaughter is AI'ed into some porn.

[–] DessertStorms@kbin.social 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

How the fuck does someone go from "I want to punish this person" to "lets make porn of a woman in his life who has nothing to do with it, that'll show 'em!"??

Surely there are a million ways you can come up with to include whichever lawmaker in a deepfake that don't include violating an unrelated woman?

[–] FigMcLargeHuge@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Because that's a news story I have already read about. This has happened to people. No need to be so sanctimonious.