this post was submitted on 14 Aug 2023
759 points (99.5% liked)

Technology

59605 readers
3368 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
L3s@fry.gs
L4s@fry.gs
L4s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
759
YouTube’s anti-ad blocking test gets even pushier with a new timer (www.androidpolice.com)
submitted 1 year ago by fne8w2ah@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world
342 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] moitoi@feddit.de 43 points 1 year ago (2 children)

This is one of these problem with multiple unsolvable issues:

  • people are used to ad block and won't change
  • the price is too high for part of the population (-> ad block for part of them)
  • $1/month, $10/year would attract new paid account but not that much
  • people can't afford/don't want a subscription everything
  • users don't see any value in it
  • a fraction of the paid will go ad block with the price increase
  • people will circumvent the ad block block
  • capitalism
  • ...
[–] Pechente@feddit.de 15 points 1 year ago

They already solved it. Premium was way cheaper before they started bundling it with Music which is just utter garbage. I’d pay like 5€ / month for YouTube Premium without Music IF the experience was actually good and they didn’t shove shorts in my face everywhere like that non-dismissable panel that breaks up my subscriptions now.

[–] tibi@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think a lot of people would subscribe if they had a lower price tier where they have a reduced amount of ads (like an ad every few videos). Without ad blockers, youtube is unwatchable, you get more ads than you would on TV (where in many places ads are legally capped at around 15mins/hour).

[–] Pregnenolone@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I think they are likely to pull a Netflix and create a lower premium tier with ad support and missing other premium features like picture in picture