38
submitted 2 days ago* (last edited 1 day ago) by Zedstrian@lemmy.dbzer0.com to c/uspolitics@lemmy.world

Since 2017, Wikipedia editors have compiled a list of news sources from which articles are highly likely to employ systematic bias, lack professional editing and/or journalistic standards, regularly misrepresent sources, and/or fabricate information.

While its list is by no means a complete list of publications with the aforementioned problems, it has helped make Wikipedia articles more reliable by basing them off of sources covering the same events and information from a more objective and factual point of view.

To make Lemmy news communities better than their Reddit counterparts, I think avoiding links to those sources in favor of more reliable alternatives would be worthwhile.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Carrolade@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago

Yeah, prohibiting extremely biased sources is probably a good idea, and that list sounds like it has a sound basis.

this post was submitted on 28 Jun 2024
38 points (88.0% liked)

USpolitics

601 readers
6 users here now

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS