46
submitted 2 days ago by poVoq@slrpnk.net to c/technology@slrpnk.net
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] A_A@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago

... "using 3D printing – but instead of concrete, they used sand combined with a binder." ... o.k.

[-] Transporter_Room_3@startrek.website 7 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

So.... Mortar.

IT'S TOTALLY DIFFERENT BRO

[-] Skua@kbin.earth 10 points 2 days ago

Concrete is something like a tenth of humanity's total CO2 emissions, so if this is something that lets us use less concrete then that's actually great

Plus structurally, even if it were off-the-shelf concrete vs mortar, it's still structurally different, so I'm sure that also makes a difference.

Mostly I was just making fun of the phrasing and distinction without actually clarifying the difference.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
this post was submitted on 28 Jun 2024
46 points (97.9% liked)

Solarpunk technology

2144 readers
21 users here now

Technology for a Solar-Punk future.

Airships and hydroponic farms...

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS