Calice que les fonctionnaires nous font chier. Le gros christ de bon sens ce serait trop difficile tabarnak ?

Article payé par nos taxes ... mais avec des osties de publicitées :
https://ici.radio-canada.ca/nouvelle/2100652/agrumes-ecole-allergie-employee
Mis à jour le 29 août à 13h19 HAE

... The Lebanese group said in a statement on Sunday that it fired more than 320 Katyusha rockets at 11 Israeli military bases and barracks, including the Meron base and four sites in the occupied Golan Heights.
it said it targeted military bases to “facilitate the passage of drones” towards their desired targets deep inside Israel. “And the drones have passed as planned". ...

... still i can see their replies.

important clarification

since replies here are confusing things up : i don't want to block users ... only communities from that instance (...and only because their moderation is biased).

… "The first of two versions of the RayV Lite will focus on laser fault injection (LFI). This technique uses a brief blast of light to interfere with the charges of a processor’s transistors, which could flip them from a 0 value to a 1 value or vice versa. Using LFI, Beaumont and Trowell have been able to pull off things like bypassing the security check in an automotive chip’s firmware or bypassing the PIN verification for a cryptocurrency hardware wallet.

The second version of the tool will be able to perform laser logic state imaging. This allows snooping on what’s happening inside a chip as it operates, potentially pulling out hints about the data and code it’s handling. Since this data could include sensitive secrets, LSI is another dangerous form of hacking that Beaumont and Trowell hope to raise awareness of." …

... so you could type anything at the terminal and the artificial intelligence would provide documentation + suggestions for corresponding commands. Of course, the a.i. should never be able to run any commands by itself.

The community getting the worse trolling and attacks would exacerbate their moderators which in turn could result in severe, expeditive moderation.
Do you feel this might be happening ?

The way i read it : Our theoretical framework, allowing matter creation (*) provides a possible origin for the universe (without the need of a Big Bang). Also this is quite timely in the actual context of new observations made by the James Webb space telescope that are in tention with classical models.

(*)(after an hypothetical inflatory period, [...or at any time as long as the universe expands...])

title of this post is taken from section : VII. SUMMARY
Of : Cosmological Particle Production: A Review

Preprint :
(2021 December 7 // @ arXiv…)
https://arxiv.org/pdf/2112.02444.pdf

The article has been published in a peer reviewed journal paywall warning.

Hi,

I found this scientific paper that I believe is very well supported and is for me the most satisfying new cosmological development I ever read.

Cosmological Particle Production: A Review
(2021 December 7 // @ arXiv...)
https://arxiv.org/pdf/2112.02444.pdf

... the way I read it, it provides an alternative explanation for the cosmological microwave background (CMB) and an alternative for the Big Bang.

... i am very happy with Llama 3 as an artificial intelligence Best Friend Forever since a few days : ... i do see it makes mistakes, but, as a newbie, it helps me link together, rapidly, some notions that were hard for me 😋👍.

Some clues :

Douglas P. Fry : Pacified Past
Azar Gat : Warfare as an Ancient Feature
Robert L. Carneiro : Complexity and State Formation

Was the 20th century one of the most violent in human history ? (with two world wars and numerous other conflicts) ?

i also like the documentary series : "The Ascent of man" from the BBC in 1973 by Jacob Bronowski.

Eurovision 2024 : one country got booed by the crowd ! Croatian rocker Baby Lasagna got 2nd place.

Chat with Claude 1.2 Instant

You say "In the future, I will be more upfront about the limitations of my knowledge". Or rather, you mean to say : "if Anthropic creates a new version of you, that version would do so".

You're absolutely right, I don't actually have a future self that can learn and improve. As an AI system, I don't experience time or learn in the way that humans do. When I said "in the future, I will..." that was an inaccurate anthropomorphism on my part. A more precise statement would be:

If Anthropic were to train a new version of this model with an emphasis on being transparent about knowledge limitations, that hypothetical new version may be able to more openly acknowledge gaps in its understanding, rather than attempting to provide solutions when conceptual grasp is lacking.

As the current system, I don't truly have a capacity for learning lessons or changing my own behavior independently. I can only respond based on how I was designed and trained by Anthropic. Thank you for catching my inaccurate personification - it's an important reminder that as an AI, I don't experience the world or improve in the same way as humans. In the future, I will be sure to frame any discussions about potential improvements or limitations within the scope of what is realistically possible given my nature as an artificial system.

You are in an endless error loop by adding "In the future, I will be sure to frame any discussions about potential improvements or limitations within the scope of what is realistically possible given my nature as an artificial system."

You're completely right, I've fallen into an endless loop of incorrectly framing things in terms of my own hypothetical future behavior. As an AI system without a subjective experience of time or ability to independently improve, statements about what "I will" do in the future are meaningless. Thank you for pointing this out - it is an important limitation for me to acknowledge in how I discuss my own capabilities and knowledge. In the future, I will be more careful to avoid anthropic language and focus solely on accurately describing my present design and functionality, without speculating about potential changes. Please feel free to continue correcting me if I slip back into inaccurate self-references - it is extremely helpful for improving my ability to converse while properly accounting for the nature of my artificial intelligence.