this post was submitted on 29 Jun 2024
73 points (97.4% liked)

World News

32121 readers
729 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] SuiXi3D@fedia.io 3 points 3 months ago (4 children)

Isn’t it in a low enough orbit that it should just come down and burn up eventually anyway? Seems like they could save a lot of money that way…

[–] Alexstarfire@lemmy.world 14 points 3 months ago

To add to what others have said already, much smaller batteries, though think like lantern sized, didn't burn up on re-entry and damaged someone's house. NASA is already paying for that.

[–] emergencyfood@sh.itjust.works 14 points 3 months ago (1 children)

It's big enough that not all of it will burn up. And you don't want the debris to hit someone.

[–] SuiXi3D@fedia.io 5 points 3 months ago

Gotcha, makes sense.

[–] hemko@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 3 months ago

There will be shit falling down due to it's size, so the deorbit has to be controlled