425

J.K. Rowling is embroiled in a fresh row with another Harry Potter actor over transgender rights.

Following exchanges of fire with Daniel Radcliffe and others, Rowling has blasted David Tennant after the Goblet of Fire star voiced strident views on those who speak out against trans rights.

During an appearance at the British LGBT Awards over the weekend, he called on British equalities minister Kemi Badenoch to “shut up” after she advocated for banning trans women from entering women’s toilets and sports teams.

In an interview at the same event, Tennant called transgender critics “a tiny bunch of little whinging f*ckers who are on the wrong side of history, and they’ll all go away soon.”

Earlier in the week, Rowling branded people like Tennant the “gender Taliban.” In posts on X (once Twitter) on Friday, she expanded her comments to address Tennant’s “wrong side of history” quote.

Rowling wrote: “This man is talking about rape survivors who want female-only care, the nurses currently suing their health trust for making them change in front of a man, girls and women losing sporting opportunities to males and female prisoners incarcerated with convicted sex offenders.”

She added: “For a man who’s supposedly a model of compassion and tolerance, he sure does want a lot of people to cease to exist.”

Previously.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] mecfs@lemmy.world 62 points 2 days ago

I’m so glad I pirated the harry potter audiobooks and didn’t give a cent to this bigot

[-] muse@fedia.io 44 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

I'm so glad I stopped giving a shit about Harry Potter and accepted that just because a zeitgeist happened in my childhood doesn't mean I should cling to fictional fantasy that hadn't actually done anything novel in the genre or touched upon topics that aren't handled in better novels elsewhere

[-] A_Union_of_Kobolds@lemmy.world 32 points 2 days ago

Dude I'm saying! Harry Potter was never good, it was just popular

And yeah I read them and watched them, at least the first few. I'm not talking out of my ass. It's a series with a few imaginative ideas sprinkled throughout otherwise super typical schlock with casually racist seasoning.

Fuck Harry Potter

[-] Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 day ago

Yep, I never understood the appeal besides making kids feel special. It seemed like a water down fantasy which when I criticized people just said read the books.

Ironically I did read the first one before the movies became a big hit. It was an okay children’s book at best.

For some reason we have these unwritten social rules that say you can’t critique certain pop culture icons once they hit critical mass.

[-] zalgotext@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago

Harry Potter is sort of the Classic Lays potato chip of the children's book world. Dependable, reliable, not the most exciting in the world but any stretch, but easily snackable all the same.

They're easy to read, not super deep, and because of that, probably got a lot of kids into reading who otherwise wouldn't have, and there's something to be said for that. It's unfortunate that the author turned out to be a bigot the whole time.

[-] bitchkat@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

I unfortunately had to watch all the movies because I had a child of the appropriate age range that wanted to watch them. Every last one was boring as all hell. Some of them were even in the theater so I added a little to them being popular. But they were not good.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
this post was submitted on 30 Jun 2024
425 points (93.5% liked)

United Kingdom

3911 readers
764 users here now

General community for news/discussion in the UK.

Less serious posts should go in !casualuk@feddit.uk or !andfinally@feddit.uk
More serious politics should go in !uk_politics@feddit.uk.

Try not to spam the same link to multiple feddit.uk communities.
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric news, and should be either a link to a reputable source, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread.

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS