Creating a derivative work without a license to do so would be copyright infringement.
Yes but you don't have a right to create derivative works which by definition is all that AI can spit out.
A. State Legislature writes laws and they are passed when the executive branch (governor) signs them B. State supreme court determines if laws that have been passed are legal (if challenged). They don't write laws. C. They already had the voters decide in 2020. It passed and the legislature refused to follow through and said "no, we're not gonna do that"
So what's going to stop SD from doing the same thing this time?
They (SD) already voted to approve in 2020 but the legislature said "nope, we're not doing that".
You can just login at office.com on your mobile browser.
Then things will have to wait until the code is of sufficient quality to be accepted.
My experience is exactly the opposite. I don't work for a FAANG but I've been around the block a bit. Its always the junior devs that try and add new warnings etc to the code base. I always require warnings to be cleaned up even if that means disabling specific instances (but not the whole rule) because the rule is flagging a false negative.
This one kind of reminds of Larry Ellison but looks a bit more human than the real Larry
emotions yes. Like us, I don't have the capabilities to determine if their emotions are like ours.
It projects future generations if the MAGA wingnuts happen to capture control of their state legislature. They would have to repeal a state constitution amendment which should have a higher bar than passing a law.
We need to vote for "Not Trump" even if its just to ensure that there is a "Not Trump" in future elections.
All of those derivative works are licensed.