Collapse

316 readers

15 users here now

This is the place for discussing the potential collapse of modern civilization and the environment.

Collapse, in this context, refers to the significant loss of an established level or complexity towards a much simpler state. It can occur differently within many areas, orderly or chaotically, and be willing or unwilling. It does not necessarily imply human extinction or a singular, global event. Although, the longer the duration, the more it resembles a ‘decline’ instead of collapse.

RULES

1 - Remember the human

2 - Link posts should come from a reputable source

3 - All opinions are allowed but discussion must be in good faith.

4 - No low effort, high volume and low relevance posts.

Related lemmys:

founded 5 months ago

MODERATORS

eleitl@lemm.ee

maketotaldestr0i@lemm.ee

eris@lemm.ee

Supreme Court Corrects EPA Opinion After Gorsuch Confuses Laughing Gas With Air Pollutant (www.forbes.com)

submitted 4 months ago by eris@lemm.ee to c/collapse@lemm.ee

6 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] NegativeInf@lemmy.world 23 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Courts should not be the regulatory authority of pollutants. Experts in the field working within the bounds of a framework set forth by legislation should be. Bring back Chevron Deference.

This was a terrible decision.

[–] FireTower@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago

Pre or post Loper Bright courts were not the regulatory authority, that's the Executive. The Judiciary determines the bounds of the framework set forth by the Legislative branch, through judicial review. Because the judiciary is our experts on the construction of statutes.