this post was submitted on 02 Jul 2024
497 points (99.6% liked)

Technology

59422 readers
2819 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ml/post/17558715

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] themurphy@lemmy.ml -2 points 4 months ago (3 children)

Sodium batteries will not replace lithium in cars, as the density is too low.

It means the battery weighs more but contains less power.

For an EV, that wouldn't work, as the heavier the car is, the more power it uses.

With sodium you will probably half the range of the EV, which is already low.

[–] frezik@midwest.social 6 points 4 months ago

The newer sodium batteries are comparable to LFP batteries from a few years ago.

For medium distance commuter cars and inner city travel those things dont matter and will probably be outweighed by the cost savings, safety and reliability of sodium batteries. The main issue right now with getting EVs into more peoples hands is cost.

probably half the range of an EV

Many EVs have ~250 miles range. I need a quarter of that in usable winter range for my commute. If I could get an EV with 125 miles of advertised range (about half that in winter) for a third the price, I'd do it.

It's not going to replace my road tripping car, but it could replace my commuter, which needs very little range.