this post was submitted on 03 Jul 2024
69 points (100.0% liked)

news

23451 readers
710 users here now

Welcome to c/news! Please read the Hexbear Code of Conduct and remember... we're all comrades here.

Rules:

-- PLEASE KEEP POST TITLES INFORMATIVE --

-- Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed. --

-- All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body. --

-- If you are citing a twitter post as news please include not just the twitter.com in your links but also nitter.net (or another Nitter instance). There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/libredirect/ or archive them as you would any other reactionary source using e.g. https://archive.today . Twitter screenshots still need to be sourced or they will be removed --

-- Mass tagging comm moderators across multiple posts like a broken markov chain bot will result in a comm ban--

-- Repeated consecutive posting of reactionary sources, fake news, misleading / outdated news, false alarms over ghoul deaths, and/or shitposts will result in a comm ban.--

-- Neglecting to use content warnings or NSFW when dealing with disturbing content will be removed until in compliance. Users who are consecutively reported due to failing to use content warnings or NSFW tags when commenting on or posting disturbing content will result in the user being banned. --

-- Using April 1st as an excuse to post fake headlines, like the resurrection of Kissinger while he is still fortunately dead, will result in the poster being thrown in the gamer gulag and be sentenced to play and beat trashy mobile games like 'Raid: Shadow Legends' in order to be rehabilitated back into general society. --

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Saeculum@hexbear.net 28 points 3 months ago (27 children)

There are no natural systems untouched by human actions, and there is no way to separate the consequences of a changing environment like extinction from human activity.

Conservation is a movement to preserve the natural systems that were here before industrialisation, and are here now, not to "let nature run it's course*.

what right do humans have to intervene in this?

There are no rights in nature, rights are a part of the fabric of society. We want to conserve nature and so we will.

[–] Hatandwatch@hexbear.net -1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (25 children)

And what happens when this intervention causes new unforeseen consequences? How many disruptions until we leave well enough alone?

We don't live in nature. We literally live in a human society. Rights do apply to us within our own realm lmao.

Edit: You probably stack rocks.

[–] Saeculum@hexbear.net 17 points 3 months ago (5 children)

We don't live in nature. We literally live in a human society.

Human society exists entirely within nature. There's not some diving line where this place over here is natural and this place over there is unnatural. We decide what rights we have to what, because we decided that rights should exist.

And what happens when this intervention causes new unforeseen consequences? How many disruptions until we leave well enough alone?

There is no leaving well enough alone, unless you are content to watch it decline into deserts and polluted wastelands. Every action has consequences, and since we have already acted, the state of nature is the consequence of our action whether or not we continue to intervene.

[–] Hatandwatch@hexbear.net 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Very colonizer-brained. We certainly can delineate ourselves to a certain degree. At what scope have we tried leaving well enough alone for nature to run its course? Human "wisdom" has caused untold damage, what makes you so certain that same wisdom is what's best?

And this isn't a call for humanity to stop progressing or anything(though maybe....) just that well intentioned conservation seems short sighted and self serving. I'm not convinced our intervention is what will halt the decay.

[–] HelltakerHomosexual@hexbear.net 4 points 3 months ago

colonizer brain is when uh conserving native species

your takes are getting even more fucking stupid

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (22 replies)
load more comments (23 replies)