this post was submitted on 14 Aug 2023
363 points (93.5% liked)

Lemmy.world Support

3228 readers
1 users here now

Lemmy.world Support

Welcome to the official Lemmy.world Support community! Post your issues or questions about Lemmy.world here.

This community is for issues related to the Lemmy World instance only. For Lemmy software requests or bug reports, please go to the Lemmy github page.

This community is subject to the rules defined here for lemmy.world.

To open a support ticket Static Badge


You can also DM https://lemmy.world/u/lwreport or email report@lemmy.world (PGP Supported) if you need to reach our directly to the admin team.


Follow us for server news ๐Ÿ˜

Outages ๐Ÿ”ฅ

https://status.lemmy.world/



founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
363
Please fix Rule 1. (lemmy.world)
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by remotelove@lemmy.world to c/support@lemmy.world
 

A shroom community was removed from lemmy.world as it was considered "illegal" content by the admins. The logic behind this is boggling, to say the least.

Marijuana is considered an illegal substance in some states in the US and is still federally illegal. /c/trees should be banned, correct?

Clown pictures of Putin are absolutely considered illegal in Russia, so that should require and immediate ban.

Freedom of speech can also be considered illegal in some places.

Incest is considered illegal so that should automatically trigger a ban on all incest porn, real or not. Hell, porn is universally taboo, so that shouldn't have any place on this instance, I guess.

You see where I am going with this? Rule 1 is a catch-all and needs clarification. Simply saying something is illegal is not quite enough. Owning and sharing pictures of shrooms is not illegal. Trading spores or mycelium is generally not illegal either.

This is not about me being salty (which I am) about the community being removed and forced to relocate. It's the odd bias that was applied to justify its removal.

Please note that I said fix Rule 1, not remove it. There are some really bad things on the internet that shouldn't use lemmy as a safe haven.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] Potatos_are_not_friends@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This is my leaning.

Y'all gotta stop that whining and really lean into the "Blackjacks and Hookers" solution.

[โ€“] cacheson@kbin.social 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Yeah, this is why I like topic-specialized instances:

  • They have admins that are actually interested in the topic and will tailor the rules appropriately.
  • Hopefully are set up in and administered from friendly jurisdictions, to reduce legal risk.
  • Will be less likely to shy away from the risk of (possibly frivolous) legal action, whereas the admins of a general instance are more inclined to play it safe.

We need to think of what we're doing here less as recreating reddit, and more as linking together all those old phpBB-style enthusiast forums.

[โ€“] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

That's an excellent way to think about it! Especially with links between forums taking you to the other site, and a lack of account sharing, this isn't a distributed Reddit. Trying to make Lemmy into that causes all sorts of issues-- What instance do I search on to find [insert community here]? Where should I make my account? Even stuff like every community or user gravitating towards a few large instances. Each instance should be meaningfully distinct, with a set of communities related to a particular topic. This works best with the infrastructure and I feel like it would help solidify the culture as well. It would really help out the Local communities option too. Your choice of instance(s) should be meaningful, not meaningless.