this post was submitted on 14 Aug 2023
299 points (97.2% liked)

Trees

6633 readers
9 users here now

A community centered around cannabis.

In the spirit of making Trees a welcoming and uplifting place for everyone, please follow our Commandments.

  1. Be Cool.
  2. I'm not kidding. Be nice to each other.
  3. Avoid low-effort posts

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

“More than one-third of participants felt that daily smoking of cannabis was safer than tobacco, and their views increasingly favored safety of cannabis vs tobacco over time (1742 participants [36.7%] in 2017 vs 2107 participants [44.3%] in 2021; P < .001)”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] herrwoland@lemmy.world 94 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Not that I have anything against Marijuana, but I'd prefer a study or something like "79% of researchers in the field believe.." , because if we go with what majority thinks on scientific topics , we are going to have a bad time.

[–] polyrhythm@lemm.ee 21 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

That's fair. Agreed, I'd love to see that stat. For me, tracking public perception over time is helpful and insightful in its own way. For example: Anticipating voting trends and legislation.

It's also worth noting there are several barriers for effective cannabis research to happen, even with all the changes in legalization, production, and access. Here's an article from 2021 about research challenges, but progress has been made recently

[–] legion02@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

Yep, you poll citizens when you want to know if something is politically popular.

[–] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 17 points 1 year ago

Public perception is a valid topic of study in its own right.

[–] Anticorp@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

"Facts are meaningless. You can prove anything that is even remotely true with facts."

--Homer J. Simpson

[–] sadreality@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

Most "science" is funded people who are paying for specific results.