Technology

59593 readers

2960 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

1532

Google Chrome ships a default, hidden extension that allows code on *.google.com access to private APIs, including your current CPU usage (fedi.simonwillison.net)

submitted 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) by Andromxda@lemmy.dbzer0.com to c/technology@lemmy.world

199 comments fedilink hide all child comments

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/post/23752739

https://simonwillison.net/2024/Jul/9/hangout_servicesthunkjs/

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] jinarched@lemm.ee 42 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (3 children)

Just use Firefox

shrug

[–] Andromxda@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 4 months ago

Or LibreWolf !librewolf@lemmy.ml

[–] Katana314@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

My biggest issue is video streaming on older computers. I have an old laptop I use casually for video playing in the background, and Webkit browsers like Edge definitely load YouTube with far less stuttering. I'm still trying to find good alternatives - lately even changing the user agent doesn't seem to make it faster.

[–] TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

This to me sounds like an issue with hardware video decoding not working right and it falling back to software decoding on the CPU.

[+] nutsack@lemmy.world -20 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (2 children)

there's a portion of the internet that just doesn't work in Firefox because the company pays only $2 million a year for developers and they can't do it

I mean web developers not the Firefox developers stop down voting me

I use Firefox and Linux and I don't drive a car how about that

please give me $40

[–] JaddedFauceet@lemmy.world 30 points 4 months ago (4 children)

As part of our company's security policy, our IT admin disallows firefox to be installed in dev machine.

our engineers cannot test their work in firefox.

LOL

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 10 points 4 months ago

That's wack.

I think our company does something similar (Chrome by default, need to ask IT for anything else), but our department just said, "we need Macs to do our work, you have no power here..." I hate macOS, but I hate stupid IT policies more.

[–] PlantJam@lemmy.world 6 points 4 months ago

This nonsense is part of why I prefer to work for smaller companies.

[–] xavier666@lemm.ee 1 points 4 months ago

Whenever I face an issue in our company portal and I ask the IT team, their response is "Can you please try on Google Chrome?"

🤦🏽🤦🏽

[–] nutsack@lemmy.world -1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

there's no quality control with a test suite of browsers and versions running in virtual machines?

[–] JaddedFauceet@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

Due to security policy, we cannot run vm. Oh, btw, we do android development too. I guess they didn't know android studio runs a vm. So that is ok

[–] Omgpwnies@lemmy.world 10 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I've yet to find more than a handful of pages that have had issues, and most were fairly poorly coded to begin with

[–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 2 points 4 months ago

I found one the other day but I don't even recall what it was. I almost never have any problems.