this post was submitted on 14 Jul 2024
155 points (94.3% liked)

Technology

59179 readers
2145 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] Buffalox@lemmy.world 9 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

This is not entirely fair though, they spend more than $10 billion over 10 years trying to compete against Arm, but the effort failed despite they had the production process advantage at the time. To get a better picture of the the Intel effort, they spend more on the effort than the entire Arm revenue in that period!
But Noohh ISA doesn't matter they say. ๐Ÿ˜‚ ๐Ÿคฃ

[โ€“] Wispy2891@lemmy.world 8 points 3 months ago (1 children)

You mean the decade where they tried to make arm processors and gave up just before smartphones became popular or the decade where they tried and failed to make x86 processors for smartphones ?

[โ€“] Buffalox@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

The decade they tried to make X86 compete with Arm on smartphones.
I have changed "with Arm" to "against Arm" which I suppose could have caused the doubt.