Funny

6828 readers

630 users here now

General rules:

Be kind.
All posts must make an attempt to be funny.
Obey the general sh.itjust.works instance rules.
No politics or political figures. There are plenty of other politics communities to choose from.
Don't post anything grotesque or potentially illegal. Examples include pornography, gore, animal cruelty, inappropriate jokes involving kids, etc.

Exceptions may be made at the discretion of the mods.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

TheDude@sh.itjust.works

kersploosh@sh.itjust.works

example@reddthat.com

VicksVaporBBQrub@sh.itjust.works

319

User returns after 100k-hours ban to continue conversation that got them banned in the first place. (www.pcgamer.com)

submitted 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) by simple@lemm.ee to c/funny@sh.itjust.works

31 comments fedilink hide all child comments

For reference: A 100,000 hour ban is ~11.4 years.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] atrielienz@lemmy.world 7 points 4 months ago (4 children)

I admire the dedication. Seems like a waste of time though. The account they were arguing with probably isn't even still in use. And even if it is, the argument probably isn't worth it.

[–] Twitches@lemm.ee 58 points 4 months ago

The article said he's basically only doing it for comedic purposes. It is funny.

[–] BearOfaTime@lemm.ee 41 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Waste of time?

He put it in his calendar for a reminder 11 years in the future.

Spent 5 minutes logging in and typing up his response.

Now we all benefit from it!

[–] merde@sh.itjust.works 2 points 4 months ago

👆

[–] victorz@lemmy.world 6 points 4 months ago

ez win

[–] abracaDavid 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Isn't all of this just a big waste of time though?

[–] atrielienz@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

Probably.