this post was submitted on 21 Jul 2024
191 points (76.5% liked)

Technology

59211 readers
2598 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

This is an unpopular opinion, and I get why – people crave a scapegoat. CrowdStrike undeniably pushed a faulty update demanding a low-level fix (booting into recovery). However, this incident lays bare the fragility of corporate IT, particularly for companies entrusted with vast amounts of sensitive personal information.

Robust disaster recovery plans, including automated processes to remotely reboot and remediate thousands of machines, aren't revolutionary. They're basic hygiene, especially when considering the potential consequences of a breach. Yet, this incident highlights a systemic failure across many organizations. While CrowdStrike erred, the real culprit is a culture of shortcuts and misplaced priorities within corporate IT.

Too often, companies throw millions at vendor contracts, lured by flashy promises and neglecting the due diligence necessary to ensure those solutions truly fit their needs. This is exacerbated by a corporate culture where CEOs, vice presidents, and managers are often more easily swayed by vendor kickbacks, gifts, and lavish trips than by investing in innovative ideas with measurable outcomes.

This misguided approach not only results in bloated IT budgets but also leaves companies vulnerable to precisely the kind of disruptions caused by the CrowdStrike incident. When decision-makers prioritize personal gain over the long-term health and security of their IT infrastructure, it's ultimately the customers and their data that suffer.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] TechNerdWizard42@lemmy.world 20 points 3 months ago (3 children)

Issue is definitely corporate greed outsourcing issues to a mega monolith IT company.

Most IT departments are idiots now. Even 15 years ago, those were the smartest nerds in most buildings. They had to know how to do it all. Now it's just installing the corporate overlord software and the bullshit spyware. When something goes wrong, you call the vendor's support line. That's not IT, you've just outsourced all your brains to a monolith that can go at any time.

None of my servers running windows went down. None of my infrastructure. None of the infrastructure I manage as side hustles.

[–] ocassionallyaduck@lemmy.world 7 points 3 months ago

Man, as someone who's cross discipline in my former companies, the way people treat It, and the way the company considers IT as an afterthought is just insane. The technical debt is piled high.

[–] Lettuceeatlettuce@lemmy.ml 6 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

I've seen the same thing. IT departments are less and less interested in building and maintaining in-house solutions.

I get why, it requires more time, effort, money, and experienced staff to pay.

But you gain more robust systems when it's done well. Companies want to cut costs everywhere they can, and it's cheaper to just pay an outside company to do XY&Z for you and just hire an MSP to manage your web portals for it, or maybe a 2-3 internal sys admins that are expected to do all that plus level 1 help desk support.

Same thing has happened with end users. We spent so much time trying to make computers "friendly" to people, that we actually just made people computer illiterate.

I find myself in a strange place where I am having to help Boomers, older Gen-X, and Gen-Z with incredibly basic computer functions.

Things like:

  • Changing their passwords when the policy requires it.
  • Showing people where the Start menu is and how to search for programs there.
  • How to pin a shortcut to their task bar.
  • How to snap windows to half the screen.
  • How to un-mute their volume.
  • How to change their audio device in Teams or Zoom from their speakers to their headphones.
  • How to log out of their account and log back in.
  • How to move files between folders.
  • How to download attachments from emails.
  • How to attach files in an email.
  • How to create and organize Browser shortcuts.
  • How to open a hyperlink in a document.
  • How to play an audio or video file in an email.
  • How to expand a basic folder structure in a file tree.
  • How to press buttons on their desk phone to hear voicemails.

It's like only older Millennials and younger gen-X seem to have a general understanding of basic computer usage.

Much of this stuff has been the same for literally 30+ years. The Start menu, folders, voicemail, email, hyperlinks, browser bookmarks, etc. The coat of paint changes every 5-7 years, but almost all the same principles are identical.

Can you imagine people not knowing how to put a car in drive, turn on the windshield wipers, or fill it with petrol, just because every 5-7 years the body style changes a little?

[–] HeyJoe@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

And you probably paid less to not have that happen as well!