this post was submitted on 16 Aug 2023
805 points (94.5% liked)

> Greentext

7517 readers
1 users here now

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] S50nb@lemmy.radio 21 points 1 year ago (14 children)

For some reason I do find GIMP easier to use them photoshop tho

[–] looz@sopuli.xyz 72 points 1 year ago (2 children)

"Software I'm used to is easier for me than software I have no experience with."

What a fantastic insight.

[–] LogarithmicCamel@feddit.uk 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

You would imagine this to be obvious, but people who are used to Photoshop or Reddit complain all the time that Gimp or Lemmy are not as intuitive, as the other comments fully demonstrate.

[–] Comment105@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

GIMP being free to just download from their site, and still being used far less (even by novices) than paid or pirated Photoshop really tells the whole story.

The average lemmy user compared to the general public is just far more used to trading away quality to stay with Free and Open-Source Software, to the point of sometimes apparently being blind to the mainstream option's appeal.

[–] Nalivai@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

"Whatever I use is objectively better and y'all just blind and an average hivemind bot"

[–] Comment105@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Intuitiveness is objective and measurable, and I'm very certain that Photoshop would demolish GIMP if a test was done.

[–] Dangdoggo@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

"intuitiveness is objective and measurable" is such a hilarious thing to say. Like yes it's possible to measure how quickly people can come to understand an app but to say that, therefore, we have an objective understanding of 'intuitiveness' and can say "Hamburger menu instead of kebab menu here???? That is O B J E C T I V E L Y unintuitive" is sooo fucking silly.

[–] Comment105@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago

You know what's actually silly? GIMP.

[–] Nalivai@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Not really objective in real life. There is no abstract human in a vacuum, everyone has some previous knowledge and biases. If you ever had to train a grown up how to use a mouse and the ever illusive concept of double click, you know that even with some level of skeuomorphism there is a trouble at grasping new concepts, and if we go into more complicated territory, all bets are off. Maybe for a blank slate without any prior experience existing in society and operating tools, there are some high level abstract concepts, but for a real person, intuitiveness basically means "looks familiar to a something that I personally have seen before"

[–] Comment105@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

Intuitiveness is as objective as color perception.

[–] kuberoot@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 1 year ago

Something being free to download doesn't help if the paid software is so ingrained into culture, both popular and professional, that it practically has a monopoly. If you want to get work as an artist working with other people, you'll want to learn the industry standard, not a niche program.

That's all aside from whether gimp actually is or isn't better, I just think the argument make no sense.

[–] looz@sopuli.xyz 5 points 1 year ago

Krita is much better than GIMP if you want to stick to FOSS

load more comments (11 replies)