this post was submitted on 26 Jul 2024
230 points (96.7% liked)

science

14712 readers
618 users here now

just science related topics. please contribute

note: clickbait sources/headlines aren't liked generally. I've posted crap sources and later deleted or edit to improve after complaints. whoops, sry

Rule 1) Be kind.

lemmy.world rules: https://mastodon.world/about

I don't screen everything, lrn2scroll

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
m3t00@lemmy.world
Joleee@lemmy.world
laverabe@lemmy.world
DeadPand@midwest.social
230
AI models fed AI-generated data quickly spew nonsense (www.nature.com)
submitted 3 months ago by ArcticDagger@feddit.dk to c/science@lemmy.world
52 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ArcticDagger@feddit.dk 11 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I think that hypothesis still holds as it has always assumed training data of sufficient quality. This study is more saying that the places where we've traditionally harvested training data from are beginning to be polluted by low-quality training data

[–] HowManyNimons@lemmy.world 20 points 3 months ago (1 children)

It's almost like we need some kind of flag on AI-generated content to prevent it from ruining things.

[–] Hamartiogonic@sopuli.xyz 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

If that gets implemented, it would help AI devs and common people hanging online.

[–] HowManyNimons@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

File it under "too good to happen". Most writing jobs are proofreading AI-generated shit these days. We'll need to wait until there's real money in writing scripts to de-pollute content.