this post was submitted on 29 Jul 2024
393 points (99.5% liked)

Programming

17362 readers
221 users here now

Welcome to the main community in programming.dev! Feel free to post anything relating to programming here!

Cross posting is strongly encouraged in the instance. If you feel your post or another person's post makes sense in another community cross post into it.

Hope you enjoy the instance!

Rules

Rules

  • Follow the programming.dev instance rules
  • Keep content related to programming in some way
  • If you're posting long videos try to add in some form of tldr for those who don't want to watch videos

Wormhole

Follow the wormhole through a path of communities !webdev@programming.dev



founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] inspxtr@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago (2 children)

I use gitlab ci mainly and dabble in github actions. Can you clarify how “Not even Github managed to pull that off”? IIRC, actions is quite featureful and it’s open-source, so I assume that can be run with self-hosted runners as well.

[–] loutr@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 months ago

Yep, at my previous job I moved a pretty complex build system from Jenkins to github actions. It worked fine and was much simpler to maintain.

And yes there are ways to run github actions on your own machine, but I haven't tried it.

[–] lysdexic@programming.dev 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Can you clarify how “Not even Github managed to pull that off”?

GitHub actions has an atrocious user experience, to the point that even a year or so ago people where doubting it was production-ready.

Sure, you can put together a pipeline. But I challenge anyone to try it out with GitHub actions and then just try to do the same with GitLab or even CircleCI or Travis.

The fact that people compare GitHub Actions go Jenkins of all things is everything anyone needs to know about it's user experience.