this post was submitted on 30 Jul 2024
523 points (91.2% liked)

Firefox

17302 readers
116 users here now

A place to discuss the news and latest developments on the open-source browser Firefox

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
k_o_t@lemmy.ml
523
Mozilla adds stupid AI stuff with horrible T&C (lemdro.id)
submitted 1 month ago by astro_ray@lemdro.id to c/firefox@lemmy.ml
187 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

PSA (?): just got this popup in Firefox when i was on an amazon product page. looked into it a bit because it seemed weird and it turns out if you click the big "yes, try it" button, you agree to mandatory binding arbitration with Fakespot and you waive your right to bring a class action lawsuit against them. this is awesome thank you so much mozilla very cool

https://queer.party/@m04/112872517189786676

So, Mozilla adds an AI review features for products you view using Firefox. Other than being very useless, it's T&C are as anti-consumer as it possibly can be. It's like mozilla saying directly "we don't care about your privacy".

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Blisterexe@lemmy.zip 29 points 1 month ago (1 children)

FakeSpot also only works on the biggest and most predatory platforms (Walmart and Amazon).

that also happen to be by far the most popular, and also where you are the mos likely to see fake reviews

[–] LWD@lemm.ee 13 points 1 month ago (2 children)

"If the privacy invasion and corporate trend chasing doesn't hurt your soul"?

Did you miss the privacy invasion where Mozilla now sells private data to advertising companies directly?

[–] iAvicenna@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

they seem to be basically saying that they make most of their profit by selling your private data to advertisers, trend calculators etc etc

[–] Blisterexe@lemmy.zip -1 points 1 month ago (2 children)

all the data that goes through the firefox integration is anonymised

[–] LWD@lemm.ee 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

We are talking about Mozilla FakeSpot, not Mozilla PPA...

I know, there's so many privacy issues right now that it's hard to keep track.

[–] Blisterexe@lemmy.zip -2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

i am talking about fakespot

[–] LWD@lemm.ee 10 points 1 month ago (2 children)

The letters "anon" don't appear anywhere in the privacy policy.

So where are you pulling this claim from, because it doesn't smell right...

[–] jet@hackertalks.com 4 points 1 month ago

Mozilla claims the service respects your privacy because they are using OHTTP (which does NOT provide anonymity)... The marketing speak implies anonymity heavily, but doesn't say it

[–] Blisterexe@lemmy.zip -1 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] LWD@lemm.ee 2 points 1 month ago (2 children)

That's not the privacy policy.

The FakeSpot privacy policy is right here. No mention of anonymization when they sell data to ad brokers.

Regarding OHTTP: It's a CDN proxy with a pinkie promise. I trust their partnership with Firefox as much as I trust them with Google: not much.

With OHTTP, [Google] Safe Browsing does not see your IP address, and your Safe Browsing checks are mixed amongst those sent by other Chrome users,” Google affirms

[–] numeral_paver555@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

In OP's screenshot, you are only going to agree to Mozilla's privacy policy and FakeSpot's TOS. So the FakeSpot's privacy policy is not involved.

[–] LWD@lemm.ee 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

And if you had actually read the FakeSpot TOS:

Your contract with us includes these Terms of Use, along with any rules and policies posted on our website from time-to-time and our Fakespot Privacy Notice located at https://www.fakespot.com/privacy-notice

[–] numeral_paver555@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 month ago

You are right. I think they should make it more clear.

In the FakeSpot privacy notice, Google Analytics, Social Media Platforms, Contact Info, and Identifiers are not collected by Firefox, among others. So it's fair to say the data collected is not linked to the user.

The browser.shopping.experience2023.ads.enabled flag is intriguing. So I took a look. It turns out that the recommendation is only based on the current page you request the review analysis.

In general, I believe that it is primarily ambiguous legal documents rather than a genuine invasion of privacy.

[–] Blisterexe@lemmy.zip -2 points 1 month ago

I am aware its not the privacy policy, i have read through the privacy policy, however the fact that the info get proxied through and anonymised on fastly's servers counts for something

[–] vrighter@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 1 month ago

anonymization is not a silver bullet. Data gets deanonymized all the time. It's very easy to accidentally leak useful information