I guess we now know who is all behind those Sinophobic anti-China posts online. (www.theverge.com)

submitted 3 months ago by yogthos@lemmy.ml to c/worldnews@lemmy.ml

11 comments fedilink hide all child comments

all 20 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[-] hexaflexagonbear@hexbear.net 22 points 3 months ago

Wonder if there's an old school CIA guy that's like "we used to assassinate world leaders and start genocides" while posting "lol xinnie the pooh"

[-] Omega_Haxors@lemmy.ml 5 points 3 months ago

"Do you still do it?"

".... eeehh, well"

[-] yogthos@lemmy.ml 4 points 3 months ago

🤣

[-] prettybunnys@sh.itjust.works 12 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Intelligence agency that operates overseas found to be operating intelligence apparatus against foreign adversary.

Breaking news from our science reporter who claims that it has been discovered that water is wet.

[-] freagle@lemmygrad.ml 6 points 3 months ago

I mean, you say this, but liberals and even some leftcomms think Russian and Chinese propaganda are totalizing phenomena and that the USA has more liberty and is mostly reacting to the behaviors of the evil foreign geniuses who are also incompetent. So having Reuters publish this story is pretty important. More so given how much Reuters has participated in previous propaganda campaigns.

[-] yogthos@lemmy.ml -3 points 3 months ago

Oh hey, quick question, that's how you feel about the whole Russiagate thing as well right?

[-] prettybunnys@sh.itjust.works 10 points 3 months ago

Yeah. It’s not shocking that it’s happening.

I don’t think I assigned any morality to it in my statement.

[-] yogthos@lemmy.ml -4 points 3 months ago

I'm not assigning any morality to anything either. I'm just pointing out that libs in US are still trotting out Russiagate conspiracy theory as proof of unprecedented levels of foreign interference in politics.

[-] prettybunnys@sh.itjust.works 7 points 3 months ago

Sure, I can tell you aren’t pushing a bias or assigning morality especially given your loaded language; to that end why am I being questioned on my stance about something else you clearly aren’t assigning morality to either?