this post was submitted on 21 May 2024
48 points (94.4% liked)

United States | News & Politics

7227 readers
185 users here now

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] conditional_soup@lemm.ee 40 points 6 months ago

The US government saving big money on fleet expenses by all travelling in the same clown car.

[–] vzq@lemmy.blahaj.zone 32 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Way to show you are committed to the international rules based order, mister Secretary.

[–] WhatIsH2O4@lemmy.ml 14 points 6 months ago

Lol, it's been "rules for thee, not for me" for quite a long time. In particular, look at the US's 2002 Hague Invasion Act that basically says they don't give a fuck what the court says and if they mess with the US or US military, they'll do anything in their power to stop it, including taking military actions.

[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 3 points 6 months ago

The rules are that US does whatever it wants, and everybody else has to do what US tells them to.

[–] Bonesince1997@lemmy.world 21 points 6 months ago

The US always thinks it's above international scrutiny. And it often votes against just about the whole world on matters. Seems pretty obvious they are bad faith actors that need to be kept in check from time to time. Without it, it'll just be business as usual, with the US thinking it can do what it wants and no one dare say otherwise. Freedom fries 🍟

[–] dessalines@lemmy.ml 18 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Another hague invasion act incoming.

[–] WhatIsH2O4@lemmy.ml 7 points 6 months ago

They never got rid of the first one, now they'll just grandfather in Israel.

[–] eran_morad@lemmy.world 12 points 6 months ago
[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 3 points 6 months ago

Welcome to the 'rules based' world order.

[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 2 points 6 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


“Given the events of yesterday, I think we have to look at the appropriate steps to take to deal with again, what is a profoundly wrongheaded decision,” Blinken said at a State Department budget hearing with the Senate Foreign Relations Committee.

Blinken’s comments were an early indication of the Biden administration’s openness to taking action against the Netherlands-based court for its application for arrest warrants for the senior Israeli officials.

The court’s chief prosecutor Karim Khan also issued warrants for senior Hamas officials, including its leader in Gaza, Yahya Sinwar.

In a Senate Appropriations subcommittee hearing on Tuesday afternoon, Blinken said he would “welcome” working with Sen. Lindsey Graham on “bipartisan” sanctions against the ICC.

“It’s clear Israel wants to do all it can to ensure civilian protection,” said Biden at a White House reception marking Jewish American Heritage Month.

Meanwhile, the Biden administration has faced questions about its condemnation of the ICC’s actions while saying it continues to support the court’s investigation into Russian war crimes during its invasion of Ukraine.


The original article contains 553 words, the summary contains 172 words. Saved 69%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] juicy 1 points 6 months ago

Elections have consequences