We think it's probably PCOS, but the ~~death panel~~ insurance won't pay for the test, so we're treating empirically. It improved some of her symptoms, but not that one, and I'm cool with it. I've accepted that this is our relationship.
conditional_soup
Not if we're just giving it away to the richest people on earth to feed into a plagiarism generator, no. There's either IP law for everyone, and EVERYONE gets DMCA, or there's IP law for nobody. Nobody is above the law, including AI execs.
Well, the biggest change in our case was that she basically did not want to be touched for the whole pregnancy plus a full year afterwards. To provide some context and what I mean, she'd get annoyed with holding hands, and really frustrated with hugging. Physical contact is big for me, so that was really rough. Then, she convinced me that every pregnancy is different and that probably wouldn't happen the next time (it did). It's been over a decade, and I've basically just come to terms with the fact that sex really isn't a part of our relationship anymore. That was a really, really difficult thing to adjust to, but I did adjust to it. I eventually saw that it had to be a choice, and had to ask myself what was more important. I decided that I liked my relationship with my wife and my kids better than I liked sex. I'm not going to try and convince you that it's better; it's not, it's just different, and I'm good with that. Definitely not everyone would be, YMMV.
I don't want to frighten you, OP, I'm just telling you my lived experience. It really is different for every person, and having kids is not an easy thing, so it's going to change you. You can't say how your partner may change any more than you can know how much you'll change in five years. Only you and your partner can decide what you're both willing to put up with. If you want to stay with them, do it. If not, don't.
I'm mostly sure it's only that cheap:
- because the train is a realistic alternative
AND
- they're probably operating at a loss or near loss and covering the cost from other operations (like if they're a subsidiary of a US company, for example) in order to convince people of how cheap and convenient air travel is. See? You don't need trains! Just dismantle your rail system, you can trust us to have a monopoly on your long distance travel.
But rich people told me that it fixed transit in England =(
Sleeper trains like Nightjet exist now, but you have to book weeks or even months in advance to find a seat.
This seems like a really obvious demand signal for expanding the availability of this kind of service =\
Boeing: por que no los dos?
Yeah, not going to happen. Rent-seeking behavior is soon going to make this the default and we'll be right back to ticket prices over even what we're at now.
Nooooo, haha, you don't need high speed rail, you'll hate high speed rail, it's too expensive to build, besides, remember the videos of how crowded the metros are? and you "hAtE oThEr PeOpLe", right? Here, do the fiscally responsible thing and pay a thousand dollars to get harassed by every federal law enforcement agency, stand in our taxpayer subsidized barely held together high speed low drag tube shoulder to shoulder and dick to ass with six hundred other people for four hours, and then die either because we just DOGEd the whole ATC except for private jets or because we dropped any pretense of holding plane manufacturers accountable. We can't tell which and don't care, fuck you, don't build the trains.
FTA: The user considered it was the unpaid volunteer coders’ “job” to take his AI submissions seriously. He even filed a code of conduct complaint with the project against the developers. This was not upheld. So he proclaimed the project corrupt. [GitHub; Seylaw, archive]
This is an actual comment that this user left on another project: [GitLab]
As a non-programmer, I have zero understanding of the code and the analysis and fully rely on AI and even reviewed that AI analysis with a different AI to get the best possible solution (which was not good enough in this case).
Remember when being gay was a sex offense and they chemically castrated Turing? What they can do to the worst offenders, they can do to everyone else. They're currently proving this in the US by working to say that gay people are all pedophiles.
Well, let's replace it with whatever they're doing for the AI companies.