this post was submitted on 27 May 2024
258 points (98.1% liked)

NonCredibleDefense

6656 readers
627 users here now

A community for your defence shitposting needs

Rules

1. Be niceDo not make personal attacks against each other, call for violence against anyone, or intentionally antagonize people in the comment sections.

2. Explain incorrect defense articles and takes

If you want to post a non-credible take, it must be from a "credible" source (news article, politician, or military leader) and must have a comment laying out exactly why it's non-credible. Low-hanging fruit such as random Twitter and YouTube comments belong in the Matrix chat.

3. Content must be relevant

Posts must be about military hardware or international security/defense. This is not the page to fawn over Youtube personalities, simp over political leaders, or discuss other areas of international policy.

4. No racism / hatespeech

No slurs. No advocating for the killing of people or insulting them based on physical, religious, or ideological traits.

5. No politics

We don't care if you're Republican, Democrat, Socialist, Stalinist, Baathist, or some other hot mess. Leave it at the door. This applies to comments as well.

6. No seriousposting

We don't want your uncut war footage, fundraisers, credible news articles, or other such things. The world is already serious enough as it is.

7. No classified material

Classified ‘western’ information is off limits regardless of how "open source" and "easy to find" it is.

8. Source artwork

If you use somebody's art in your post or as your post, the OP must provide a direct link to the art's source in the comment section, or a good reason why this was not possible (such as the artist deleting their account). The source should be a place that the artist themselves uploaded the art. A booru is not a source. A watermark is not a source.

9. No low-effort posts

No egregiously low effort posts. E.g. screenshots, recent reposts, simple reaction & template memes, and images with the punchline in the title. Put these in weekly Matrix chat instead.

10. Don't get us banned

No brigading or harassing other communities. Do not post memes with a "haha people that I hate died… haha" punchline or violating the sh.itjust.works rules (below). This includes content illegal in Canada.

11. No misinformation

NCD exists to make fun of misinformation, not to spread it. Make outlandish claims, but if your take doesn’t show signs of satire or exaggeration it will be removed. Misleading content may result in a ban. Regardless of source, don’t post obvious propaganda or fake news. Double-check facts and don't be an idiot.


Join our Matrix chatroom


Other communities you may be interested in


Banner made by u/Fertility18

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Shurimal@kbin.social 60 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Considering that Russia is regularly commiting cyberattacks at it's neighboring countries, what the fuck do they expect? That we're going to let Putin's forces hack away at our critical infrastructure with abandon? What a bunch of clowns🤡

[–] Endorkend@kbin.social 42 points 6 months ago (4 children)

The ludicrous thing is that they say they are surrounding them with labs in neighboring countries. There's absolutely no reason to do that.

It's the Internet, all you need is to use the connections that are there, from wherever the fuck you want in the world.

[–] mozz@mbin.grits.dev 15 points 6 months ago

I think there’s a decent possibility that the US is sending teams of people to all these countries to investigate what Russia may be doing to them, and teach them about how to detect and prevent Russian cyber activity against their infrastructure / journalism / military targets.

It could also be purely made of, of course, but it seems a little on the specific side, and that up there is an obvious reality-possibility which actually would make sense, which you could if you wanted to mischaracterize as the nonsense activity which RT is describing.

[–] cygon@lemmy.world 7 points 5 months ago

I assume this is about the physical connections.

It could be for monitoring (even with unbroken encryption, the routing information and time/server correlation can shed light on social media influence campaigns or where VPN beachheads are located). This information could probably be gathered with ISP cooperation, too, but private business and Russian money can be a problematic mix.

It could also be preparations to isolate Russia from the internet when/if their war expands into Europe. Russia has done the reverse already in 2019, BBC: Russia 'successfully tests' its unplugged internet, probably either to stop Russian people from getting news outside of government-controlled media if the tide turns against Putin or to fend off the possibility of Western countries turning the tables and running disinformation campaigns inside Russia.

Incomplete map of internet crossover points to Russia (sorry, couldn't find a better one, it had low resolution and I upscaled it):

incomplete crossover points between European internet and Russian internet

[–] DontMakeMoreBabies@kbin.social 5 points 6 months ago

Fuck Russia? That's enough of a reason for me! Plus if the Russians respond with kinetic weapons then there's suddenly justification to do 'more stuff.'

Because fuck Russia and (most of) it's people.

[–] verity_kindle@sh.itjust.works 2 points 6 months ago

Even inside the motherland! Aieeee!

[–] Jaytreeman@kbin.social 12 points 6 months ago

Purely speculating here:

The patriot act made it so that the US government had ownership of any data that passed through US land. Is this just a way for the US to monitor all traffic going through into and out of Russia?

It's actually a big deal inside any privacy space outside of the US. For instance, any healthcare data in Canada can't go through the US. Same thing for EU countries. Bigger corporations like MS know this and have data centers available for those countries to access within their own borders.

[–] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 10 points 5 months ago

how dare they defend themselves against the legions of russian script kiddies sponsored by the FSS/FSB, the fucking nerve

[–] Earthprototype@lemmy.world 9 points 6 months ago

Nothing better than hearing the vatniks screech: it means it works. Cope and seethe.

[–] Pringles@lemm.ee 9 points 6 months ago

Finally I hear something about this, funnily enough about a meme based on Sputnik whining, which makes it even better. I really was wondering when we would start taking more aggressive cyber security measures, but then I also hoped they were just keeping it silent, as that's what I would do.

[–] ShadowRam@fedia.io 8 points 6 months ago

2016

US expels Russian diplomats over cyber attack allegations https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-38463025

Now Russia is complaining?

[–] Live_your_lives@lemmy.world 8 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Is there any possible benefit to having such "labs" in neighboring countries? Like, could they be directly intercepting data coming out of Russia or something?

[–] swab148@startrek.website 12 points 6 months ago

Probably just an excuse to invade. Call it a "War on Cyberterrorism" or smth.

[–] psmgx@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago

Those Latvian APTs are something else. Get hacked by a literal potato.