The ‘45 seconds to respond’ format was a mistake. Fewer topics with longer responses might actually have been interesting, but this stifled all opportunity for any thought to be expressed in anything more than trivial detail.
It's the Twitter effect. Kids these days can't hold their attention for longer than 45 seconds.
shakes fist at clouds
Strong agree
Sunak actually getting a clap from the audience after saying he won't bow to Junior Doctor Union demands of a 35% pay increase.
I'm actually surprised at that!
Doctors do become very well paid later in their careers as consultants so there is probably limited amount of sympathy for the rough years as junior doctors where they are significantly underpaid.
That's true, however people can be junior doctors for a surprisingly long time so you can see why they are pissed off! I assumed it was the first 3 years after graduation or something until one of my friends who is a doctor explained it to me.
Junior doctors are qualified doctors in clinical training.
They have completed a medical degree and can have up to nine years' of working experience as a hospital doctor, depending on their specialty, or up to five years working and gaining experience to become a general practitioner (GP).
Most people understand that 35% is completely unreasonable, so I'm not surprised that the audience approve.
Docs have made a strategic mistake for striking in the middle of election when negotiations are impossible.
or they've made a great decision to embarrass this government just before an election and help to oust them
Except they're not going to get anything from Labour either.
Question two: Be honest about the NHS and what it's going to take to fix it.
Both candidates: 
Only one winner tonight
Orange man: bad
Orange Britain: 👌
Starmer hits a clanger on Sunak.
Starmer: Explain how the waiting figures are coming down, they were 7.2 million and now they're 7.5 million and he's supposed to be good at maths!
Sunak: B..B...But they came down from a higher figure before?
I’d guess the discrepancy is waiting times being different from the total number of people waiting. Both of those stats could feasibly be true if demand is growing all of the time.
There’s hardly enough time for questions here, terrible debate
Agreed. TV debates are more a test to the public of whether you sweat too much under studio lights these days.
That's it! Thanks for playing. My summary:
Yes, but your commentary was more entertaining than the event itself!
I thought Starmer started off well but he's getting some push back from Rishi that he needs to tackle otherwise he's going to get swamped by Rishi's combative style. Round One pretty indecisive. 😕
Moderator sounding like a stressed out supply teacher
Thank you everyone for your comments. I wasn't going to watch and you've summarised nicely.
Okay, I'm now done watching too. I dunno if this is because I'm biased, but while neither performance was fantastic, Starmer overall came across better than Sunak. By the incredibly low standards set by politicians, Starmer seemed more honest, and I definitely noted him being irritated with some of Sunak's more blatant lies. Sunak came across as a smug public school boy who always feels like he has to be right. I was particularly not impressed with Sunak making out that Labour would require people to replace boilers and cars "when they don't need to", when it's bloody obvious that the plan would be to replace them with more climate-friendly options when existing stock wears out. I wish Starmer had been more deft in challenging him on that kind of bullshit.
Starmer's experience as a lawyer helped him here, I think. He's used to debating, although clearly he's more used to a courtroom where he can speak at length to make his point. He's not good at succinct so the 45 second time limit didn't give him a chance to do his best debating. Sunak treated it more as an argument where it was more important to win than to put across a serious and thoughtful point.
Overall, I'm not a huge fan of Starmer, but I'm still happy to say I would rather have him as prime minister than Sunak.
Something like the third time Starmer has told us his dad was a tool maker.
🎶 My old man's a tool maker he wears a tool man's hat...
Second audience clap of the night is for Starmer's private school tax policy. 👏
GB Energy seems like a genuinely interesting idea from Labour. Say more on this old man! 😜
ӣ2000 worse off in taxes"
That's all he said wasn't it?
Unelected, jug-eared, toffy-nosed midget
Edit: From the BBC-
The chief Treasury civil servant wrote to Labour two days ago saying that the Conservatives’ assessment of their tax plans "should not be presented as having been produced by the civil service".
The letter from James Bowler, the Treasury permanent secretary, risks undermining Rishi Sunak’s claim in last night’s debate that Labour’s plans include £38bn of uncosted spending, which he says would mean £2,000 of tax rises per working household.
In a letter to Darren Jones, the shadow chief secretary to the Treasury, Bowler writes: "As you will expect, civil servants were not involved in the production or presentation of the Conservative Party’s document 'Labour’s Tax Rises' or in the calculation of the total figure used ... the £38bn figure used in the Conservative Party’s publication includes costs beyond those provided by the Civil Service".
"I agree that any costings derived from other sources or produced by other organisations should not be presented as having been produced by the Civil Service," he adds.
He wanted to make it the slogan of the campaign and I think it probably will be, despite this revelation from the Treasury. Starmer really should have challenged this more robustly... or at all.
Rishi says you can vote for anyone apart from the Conservatives and it will count for Labour. Awesome, everyone vote with your conscious then.
In a post-Trump, post-Brexit, post-Johnson world, I thought journalists had gotten better at calling out direct lies. Yet the moderator allowed Sunak repeatedly to lie about Labour's tax plans and to lie that the Treasury backed those figures. Just outrageous.
To be fair, so did Starmer.
I agree the moderator had a hard time getting anything of basic value from either candidate. But I wouldn't go so far as to say she encouraged Sunak's lies. She just wanted to get it over with.
Here we go
Question four: Why U so relaxed with genocide, innit?
Starmer says "we have to find a path to peace, we have to bring a permanent ceasefire"
Sunak says "I've made the decision to lead".
Tell us what you're going to actually do you fuckwits! Just question dodging as usual.
Difficult for them though isn't it? In reality, they can't do anything but line up behind any plausible peace proposal that is brokered by another country. We're not in a position to be the mediators this time.
They can't come out and say they will do something specific (unless it's just words, strongly condemn etc) because it will be hung around their necks when it doesn't happen.
I got home a bit late, so I'm streaming this on a 15 minute delay. So 10 minutes in, and Sunak really is pathetic. "Well actually, I do get it and you're wrong."
Ooo apparently we can follow and comment on the debate wherever we are by using the hashtag #ITVDebate. Assuming that also means Lemmy..... 😉
And he already looks like a dweeb! Put him out of his misery and vote him out now!
A quick fire round about education next with £140 up for grabs.....??
Rishi coming off better in this question of retirement tax than Starmer. All he has to say is "under Liz Truss, under Liz Truss". Poor from Starmer on that one.
It's ridiculous, Sunak is the person who froze the tax boundaries in the first place. Why isn't Starmer pointing that out?
Woeful so far. Both of them talking over each other in an abrasive way like this is a US presidential debate.
I didn't have high hopes for responses or even the questions for that matter. I'm in it for the gaffs. Hoping Starmer let's slip "you twat" in a hot mic moment.
Question five: The climate.
More aspirations from Starmer here, which I suspect is going to be an overall winner on this topic. Sunak's go to answer is "no we can't afford it so I'm not going to do it" seems a bit wet in comparison.
On the immigration question I think they both came out pretty well. Appealing to their core voters I must admit. But strong responses from the both of them. Hard to judge between them on this issue. Basically if you want to believe Rishi then Starmer isn't swaying you on this question, and if you want to believe Starmer then Rishi isn't persuading you.
Rishi held his own pretty well on that
Changing planning laws! Why is this a throw away right at the end? FFS.
On the subject of heat pumps, I was hearing the other day that if you buy air conditioning units but set them to reverse mode then they function exactly like heat pumps at a fraction of the price + you can keep your boiler for when it gets really cold for like 2 weeks a year. Apparently they don't want to give any finance for them because the wonks are worried people might use them when it is hot in summer.
Another quick fire round on The Donald. Fingers on your buzzers!
General Discussion for politics in the UK.
Please don't post to both !uk_politics@feddit.uk and !unitedkingdom@feddit.uk .
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.
Posts should be related to UK-centric politics, and should be either a link to a reputable news source for news, or a text post on this community.
Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.
If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread. (These things should be publicly discussed)
Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.
Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.
!ukpolitics@lemm.ee appears to have vanished! We can still see cached content from this link, but goodbye I guess! :'(