I'd rather have a kettle anyways, less dangerous and faster. And it can also be very pretty.
Oh yes I am looking at you Fellow Stagg.
this post was submitted on 07 Jun 2024
529 points (93.3% liked)
Memes @ Reddthat
1130 readers
22 users here now
The Memes community. Where Memes matter the most.
We abide by Reddthat's Instance Rules & the Lemmy Code of Conduct. By interacting here you agree to these terms.
Rules
- No NSFW content
- No bigotry - including racism, sexism, ableism, homophobia, transphobia, or xenophobia. Code of Conduct.
- Be respectful, especially when disagreeing. Everyone should feel welcome here.
- No porn.
- No Ads / Spamming.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
I don't think anybody seriously thinks that hot H2O can have a different formulation. What, are we postulating the existence of isotopes for molecules now?
load more comments
(5 replies)
Yeah, but it would taste nasty because my microwave’s minging.
Chemically yes, physically no. Microwaved water is more buoyant because it has a heat gradient and rarely boils properly. It tends to get superheated and explode rather than boiling.
This is why tea bags float on top of microwaved water but not boiled water.
Tea bags float in my kettle heated water as well. And for the 27 years I lived without a kettle and microwaved my water (maybe 2-3 times a week) I have never even once seen water get superheated and explode.
load more comments
(4 replies)
This. In the microwave, water is heated from top and sides.
In a kettle, it is heated from the bottom. With warm water rising to the top and cold water sinking to the bottom, the water will circulate to evenly distribute heat. This is the main benefit of the kettle.
I thought nearly any trace of minerals essentially reduced the likelihood of superheating down to near zero?
load more comments
(2 replies)