Very odd how the size of the tattoo appears to not matter, and that the risk appears to dip for several years after receiving the tattoo. This would seem to suggest the existence of other factors for which the data has not been properly adjusted - or just an unintuitively complex mechanism.
this post was submitted on 10 Jun 2024
39 points (100.0% liked)
Danger Dust
229 readers
9 users here now
A community for those occupationally exposed to dusts, toxins, pollutants, hazardous materials or noxious environments
Dangerous Dusts , Fibres, Toxins, Pollutants, Occupational Hazards, Stonemasonry, Construction News and Environmental Issues
#Occupational Diseases
#Autoimmune Diseases
#Silicosis
#Cancer
#COPD
#Chronic Fatigue
#Hazardous Materials
#Kidney Disease
#Pneumoconiosis
#The Environment
#Pollutants
#Pesticides
and more
Please be nice to each other and follow the rules : []https://mastodon.world/about
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS