this post was submitted on 19 Jul 2023
159 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

58306 readers
4744 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The company will disable internet access on the select desktops, with the exception of internal web-based tools and Google -owned websites like Google Drive and Gmail. Some workers who need the internet to do their job will get exceptions, the company stated in materials.

In addition, some employees will have no root access, meaning they won’t be able to run administrative commands or do things like install software.

top 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] dan1101@lemmy.world 37 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Probably not a bad idea. Google used to be full of tech nerds but it gets more corporate and bland all the time.

[–] FoxBJK@midwest.social 28 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Even in a company full of tech nerds you usually don't just hand out root access!

[–] Turkey_Titty_city@kbin.social 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

nobody should have root access other than senior admins.

[–] ndguardian@lemmy.studio 3 points 1 year ago

You’ll have to pry my root access from my cold dead fingers!

jk…take it. I’d rather not have to worry about OS-level shenanigans anymore.

[–] Streetdog@lemmy.world 25 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Not surprising Google can't handle tech security. I can't be bothered to look more into the report, but it sure sounds like they don't know tech. They're a marketing firm.

[–] mycroft@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago (2 children)

That honestly just sounds like they're going after more government contracts. Gov't compliance can sometimes require asinine security controls because they expect the users are the weakest link in every design. That can sometimes be true, but when folks are developing things you sometimes have to let them make foot guns or they can't build things.

[–] WrittenWeird@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Not just government. The security questionnaires from companies of all types I had to complete in my last job were insane. If you're sharing data between organizations in any way, infosec and legal departments get very uppity these days.

[–] 50gp@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

just need that one idiot to fall for obvious scam mails and your security is compromised

[–] Streetdog@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Then vote for Google. I just commented for the (non-)tech, not the politics.

[–] redditReallySucks@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Dev when he realizes he can't use stackoverflow: just leaves

[–] Hogger85b@kbin.social 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Shouldn't use admin account/machine for general browsing the web. Have one machine to browse and development and another to connect to anything you want to protect from risk of attack

[–] Jaysyn@kbin.social 0 points 1 year ago

Enshitifcation of a corporation is a thing too.

load more comments
view more: next ›