this post was submitted on 19 Sep 2023
66 points (94.6% liked)

Games

16689 readers
311 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

In the latest unredacted document oopsie stemming from the US Federal Trade Commission's efforts to stop Microsoft acqu…

top 28 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] notfromhere@lemmy.one 34 points 1 year ago (1 children)

"I've had numerous conversations with the LT of Nintendo about tighter collaboration and feel like if any US company would have a chance with Nintendo we are probably in the best position. The unfortunate (or fortunate for Nintendo) situation is that Nintendo is sitting on a big pile of cash, they have a [board of directors] that until recently has not pushed for further increases in market growth or stock appreciation.

“I say "until recently" as our former MS BoD member ValueAct has been heavily acquiring shares of Nintendo and I've kept in touch with [ValueAct CEO] Mason Morfit as he's been acquiring. It's likely he will be pushing for more from Nintendo stock which could create opportunities for us.

Let the enshittification begin

[–] oxideseven@lemmy.ca 17 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Publicly traded companies was just the worst damn idea ever... growth for growth's sake is ruining everything.

[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Honestly to me the real shame is everyone's retirement is tied up in Wallstreet, but no one is personally voting, that's all done by investment managers. Even in the cases where people get their proxy votes, they mostly throw them away.

Retail investment is a quarter of the market, but only 32% of retail shares had their votes cast (vs 80% for the market as a whole), and on average only 12% of a firms retail accounts vote at all.

[–] WheeGeetheCat@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If I own shares through a vanguard index, can I vote in each of those companies?

If so, how?

Someone could make a tool to make it quick and easy

[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

Depends what fund, seems like they are trialing a new proxy vote system

[–] 4am@lemm.ee 19 points 1 year ago (2 children)

If Microsoft acquired Nintendo I will give up on all video games forever.

Like yeah Nintendo is a big bad capitalist company but, just, no. I can’t think of a better way to make gaming worse.

[–] Sethayy@sh.itjust.works -5 points 1 year ago

And Nintendo loves to make trash consoles, making them insanely simple to emulate. Microsoft has decades of cyber security experience and would probably lock that right down.

(no of fence to Nintendo consoles, if anything its what made them interesting)

[–] nanoUFO@sh.itjust.works 17 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Holy monopoly if that happened. Also imagine the damage to Japanese culture if one of their treasured companies was owned by a company in another country.

[–] smallaubergine@kbin.social 11 points 1 year ago

Not very interesting news in my opinion. Lots of companies/CEOs want to acquire other companies.

[–] WheeGeetheCat@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 year ago

Microsoft would kill Nintendo so quickly. I think they could do it in 10 years tops, shadow of its former self

[–] DannyMac@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

The gaming world's response to MS buying Nintendo would make the whole Unity debacle look like a mild inconvenience in comparison... and that's what I predict for the US, not to mention how Japan would respond to this.

Archive link if you don't wanna deal with ads and whatnot:
https://web.archive.org/web/20230919083817/https://www.rockpapershotgun.com/microsoft-nintendo-acquisition-hopes-revealed-by-leaked-xbox-exec-email

Also, Firefox supports ublock Origin on Android (no clue about iThings, but probably everything is reskinned safari in apple land).
Pi-hole is also an option and while it isn't perfect, it can block many ads at the network/dns level for devices that can't support adblockers.
prepares shotgun while eyeing new smart tv suspiciously

[–] lowleveldata@programming.dev 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The site is unusable on mobile because of the aggressive ads

[–] stopthatgirl7@kbin.social 8 points 1 year ago

Sorry, I have an ad blocker on my phone so I genuinely have no idea if there are ads on a site or how bad they are anymore on mobile. Try flipping to reader view to see it without ads?

[–] Blizzard@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's on you for not using an adblocker.

[–] lowleveldata@programming.dev 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Oh really? It's not on the site for placing aggressive ads?

[–] stopthatgirl7@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

If you don’t have an ad blocker installed though, seriously, I can’t recommend getting one enough. It’s legit like night and day how different it is. There are occasional inconveniences, but it is overall so, so much better for browsing QoL.

[–] Blizzard@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

As far as I'm concerned, all ads are aggressive. I don't want to see any ads, period. Using an adblocker is a norm. It's not only a matter of civilized online experience but also privacy and security (latest example). Of course you are not required to use one, but don't go online complaining you see ads.

[–] lowleveldata@programming.dev 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm not following. How am I supposed to let everyone knows that this site is shit without complaining?

[–] Blizzard@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 year ago

Everyone else should use adblockers too.

[–] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 year ago

Shatter this corporation.

[–] mephiska@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago
[–] nyakojiru@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Would need a kind soul to verify with more trusted sources this shitty website allegations .