this post was submitted on 19 Sep 2023
279 points (100.0% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

5186 readers
344 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world.  About 1C of total warming.  Second chart:  about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability.  Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases.  About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] photonic_sorcerer@lemmy.dbzer0.com 56 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Matt Rosendale, a Montana Republican serving in the House of Representatives, responded to the Held v. Montana decision with the worst sort of condescending bluster. “This is not a school project,” he insisted. “It’s a courtroom. . . . Judge Seeley did a huge disservice to the courts and to these youths by allowing them to be used as pawns in the Left’s poorly thought-out plan to ruin our power grid and compromise our national security in the name of their Green New Fantasy.”

The only fantasy, however, was Rosendale’s characterization of the proceedings. The plaintiffs’ case was overwhelmingly persuasive, with extensive testimony from climate and pediatric health experts showing that people younger than twenty-five were going to be especially vulnerable to the many impacts climate change is going to have on physical and psychological health. In her ruling, Seeley summarized some of the damages to which the plaintiffs had testified.

I think it's crazy that there are still so many out there that still just don't get how fucked we are.

[–] GrabtharsHammer@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It is difficult to get a man to understand something when his fundraising ability and political power depends upon his not understanding it.

Greed will be the downfall of us all

[–] Serinus@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

Two Katrina-level disasters in Florida within the next 12 years.

Doesn't mean they'll recognize them. Maybe they'll just be flukes.

[–] Jaysyn@kbin.social 31 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I love it. Not getting around that without amending their Constitution, either.

[–] Bipta@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago

A higher court can still overturn it.

Awesome. Way to go Montana for leading the energy revolution!