95
submitted 1 week ago by davel@lemmy.ml to c/firefox@lemmy.ml

Also from Jamie Zawinski yesterday: Mozilla's Original Sin

Some will tell you that Mozilla's worst decision was to accept funding from Google, and that may have been the first domino, but I hold that implementing DRM is what doomed them, as it led to their culture of capitulation. It demonstrated that their decisions were the decisions of a company shipping products, not those of a non-profit devoted to preserving the open web.

Those are different things and are very much in conflict. They picked one. They picked the wrong one.

(page 2) 26 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] verdigris@lemmy.ml 218 points 1 week ago

Still the best browser to support, still the best hope of defending open web standards from Google. Call me when they implement the ads in an onerous way.

[-] scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech 153 points 1 week ago

Fucking finally. So many reactionary nerds here. Yes, it may turn to shit. It may not. The result is unknown. What I do know is Firefox has been my browser of choice for two whole decades. Chromium actively is killing adblockers. Firefox right now is not.

If something happens I'll make a switch. Right now, nothing has.

[-] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 week ago

Yeah, everything kinda bad Firefox does, everything else seems to do worse. So I'm staying with it until that changes.

[-] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 0 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Switch to Librewolf

load more comments (14 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] MrSoup@lemmy.zip 70 points 1 week ago

Why having DRM behind a "do you want to install DRM to play media" button is seen as a bad thing? Otherwise everyone would have to use chromium.

[-] scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech 78 points 1 week ago

No one can tell you here beyond "DRM bad". Which it is, and I hate it, but you're exactly right. All it would do if Firefox refused to implement would drive most users to chrome because there DRM works.

We are not the majority. The majority (and by that I mean roughly 96% of users) want their browser just to work. Taking a moral stand doesn't resonate with them, they just see a broken browser and move on.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Nighed@feddit.uk 11 points 1 week ago

Do Firefox forks support the same Firefox addon ecosystem, or do they have smaller selections/manual steps?

[-] davel@lemmy.ml 16 points 1 week ago

I couldn’t say as I can’t speak to every fork in existence, but I think most of them support all Firefox extensions. AFAIK LibreWolf does.

[-] dkxkee@mas.to 10 points 1 week ago

@davel @Nighed Have been using LibreWolf for a few weeks now, and have had no problems adding Firefox extensions.

[-] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 week ago

Generally yes

[-] c0smokram3r@midwest.social 10 points 1 week ago

Thoughts on Mullvad browser?

[-] davel@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 week ago

I’m not a security expert, but I think it’s roughly on-par with LibreWolf. I think they both come without Encrypted Media Extensions.

https://mullvad.net/en/browser/hard-facts

And here's a listing of the compile options:

[…]

  • --disable-eme (Encrypted Media Extensions, for other DRMs)
[-] c0smokram3r@midwest.social 1 points 1 week ago

TY for the info 👽

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Erika3sis@hexbear.net 9 points 1 week ago

♫ Everything I used to love has turned to shit ♫

[-] Templa@beehaw.org 7 points 1 week ago

I wish the time he spend complaining was developing an alternative. But he rather support the Apple ecosystem.

He's so petulant online with people that I can only imagine how awful it must be to have him as a boss.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] HouseWolf@lemm.ee 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

I'm gonna keep using and recommending LibreWolf for the foreseeable future.

But I wonder what other alternative web engines do we have with both Chromium and Gecko being run by advertisers now?

I know Palemoon runs a fork of a really old version of a Gecko and I used it for a bit back when Firefox 58 broke most add-ons. But I'm a bit iffy of it's security these days.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›
this post was submitted on 23 Jun 2024
95 points (71.9% liked)

Firefox

16767 readers
20 users here now

A place to discuss the news and latest developments on the open-source browser Firefox

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS