this post was submitted on 26 Jun 2024
3 points (100.0% liked)

PlayStation

656 readers
2 users here now

A community for discussing all things PlayStation.

The instance rules apply here alongside two community specific rules.

Rule 1. Please keep all discussion relevant to PlayStation consoles, games and services.

Rule 2. Lemmy.zip allows NSFW content but I’d rather keep this a safe community for gamers of all ages so please don’t post adult content here.

That’s it for the rules.

Check out the Xbox community.

If you have any suggestions, comments or concerns please send me a direct message.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 2 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Iapar@feddit.de 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I have to say that I am a bit scared that from lost their way. The more I think about it the more I come to the conclusion that they don't get their own game anymore.

Souls combat is made for slow 1-on-1encounters and shits the bed in other circumstances. They need to change the level/encounter design to match the combat or change the combat to match the level/encounter.

If you want to have a more action focused combat lean more into sekiro with deflection. Having to roll/block/wait out a fast 12 string combo isn't fun. Deflection/parry to make yourself an opening to attack the enemy is the way to go here.

[–] FooBarrington@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

If you want to have a more action focused combat lean more into sekiro with deflection. Having to roll/block/wait out a fast 12 string combo isn't fun.

I disagree - this made most of the DLC fights very tense, while also feeling mechanically tight. It honestly reminded me a lot of Sekiro: I was able to predict a lot of the attacks even on my first attempt, which made the boss fights a fun puzzle of quickly learning attack patterns while being careful with healing.

And they even added a crystal tear that gives you Sekiro style combat if you prefer that.