Technology

1340 readers

288 users here now

Which posts fit here?

Anything that is at least tangentially connected to the technology, social media platforms, informational technologies and tech policy.

Rules

1. English only

Title and associated content has to be in English.

2. Use original link

Post URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.

3. Respectful communication

All communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.

4. Inclusivity

Everyone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.

5. Ad hominem attacks

Any kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.

6. Off-topic tangents

Stay on topic. Keep it relevant.

7. Instance rules may apply

If something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.

Companion communities

!globalnews@lemmy.zip
!interestingshare@lemmy.zip

Icon attribution | Banner attribution

founded 11 months ago

MODERATORS

BrikoX@lemmy.zip

CISA: Most critical open source projects not using memory safe code (www.bleepingcomputer.com)

submitted 4 months ago by BrikoX@lemmy.zip to c/technology@lemmy.zip

4 comments fedilink hide all child comments

The U.S. Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) has published research looking into 172 key open-source projects and whether they are susceptible to memory flaws.

top 4 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] onlinepersona@programming.dev 11 points 4 months ago (1 children)

First of all, yes CVE generating languages have been here a while, unfortunately. They are very ingrained and difficult to root out.

But most importantly

Ultimately, CISA recommends that software developers write new code in memory-safe languages such as Rust, Java, and GO and transition existing projects, especially critical components, to those languages.

Fucking pay them or write them yourselves. Y'all have endless money. You can of course wait and hope the situation resolves itself, or really it along if you rely on it so much.

Anti Commercial-AI license

[–] BrikoX@lemmy.zip 11 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

Fucking pay them or write them yourselves.

This. Refactoring the whole code is insanely time intensive, even if developers know multiple languages. All these critical components you rely on, you use without any compensation or support and then dare to complain it's not to your security standards. Fix it, or pay for it to be fixed.

[–] cybersin@lemm.ee 6 points 4 months ago

What do you mean? We have our summer intern rewriting the entire Linux kernel in Rust with the help of ChatGPT. They are set to submit the PR by Friday night.

[–] cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 4 months ago

Rewriting something in rust could create more vulnerabilities. You would be throwing away your well tested code and starting over from scratch in a language you may be less familiar with. A memory safe language doesn't protect against everything.