this post was submitted on 25 Apr 2024
1 points (100.0% liked)

Autism UK

160 readers
3 users here now

A general chat and support community for autistic people in the UK.

Community Rules

Think before you post. Is your post relevant to the community?

Is your post autism-related? Is your post UK-related? If 'yes' to both, please post. If 'no' to either or both, or if you're not sure, please ask.

Think before you comment.

Please be kind to each other. Please treat everyone with respect. Please be gracious when communications get mixed up.

'When' because we are each unique, and while there may be some overlap between some of us in our communication styles, there will also be differences.

Discrimination will not be tolerated.

This includes (but is not limited to) ableism, racism and colourism, sexism, homophobia, transphobia, ageism, classism, elitism, religious affiliation, weight stigma / body shaming, and diagnosis status (self-diagnosis is valid). Please think before you post and comment, and be kind to each other.

No promotions, advertisements, fundraisers, or surveys without permission.

Make it clear if a post or comment is NSFW (Not Safe For Work).

Use NSFW in the subject line or at the start of a comment as a warning to the community.

Make it clear if a post or comment is potentially triggering.

Use TW in the subject line or at the start of a comment as a warning to the community. TW = Trigger Warning.

Do not promote Autism Speaks.


Community guidelines:

Accessibility

If your post includes a photo, please add alt text to the photo, or include an image description. If your post includes a screenshot with text, please transcribe the text in your post. If your post or comment includes an acronym or abbreviation, please use the full-length version of it in its first instance. For example:

"Your local IAS (Integrated Autism Service) may be able to help with that. There's a link to IAS is in the sidebar."

"I had to go through my local CMHT (Community Mental Health Team). The CMHT then did a referral."

Exceptions: NSFW (Not Safe For Work) and TW (Trigger Warning) - these are common acronyms across Lemmy; NHS (National Health Service)

Respect

Please respect others' privacy. Please do not reshare anything from this community, without the original poster's permission. Please do not post screenshots of private messages, or screenshots of posts from private communities to this community without the original poster's permission. Please do not send private messages without consent. It is okay to comment, "Can I send you a message?" or "Please feel free to message me about this."

Trigger Warnings

Trigger warnings help to add a level of consent to posts and comments. By adding a trigger warning, you indicate that the content beyond it may not be safe or suitable for everyone. You must add TW as a trigger warning for potentially triggering content.

You can also make it easier for readers to choose whether to keep reading by adding the type of trigger to your warning. Adding the type of trigger is optional. You can read more about types of triggers in this article from Medium.


Related (and potentially relevant) Communities:

!autism@lemmy.world

!autism@lemmy.ml

~~!neurodivergence@beehaw.org ~~ (Beehaw is currently defederated. This means you will need a separate account on Beehaw if you wish to take part in this community.)

!adhd@lemmy.world

!adhdmemes@lemmy.ml


Useful websites:

UK - National Autistic Society

Wales - Gwasanaeth Awtistiaeth Integredig/ Integrated Autism Service


Have I missed something important or useful in this sidebar? Please feel free to send me a message about it!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

A new report into autism employment makes the “moral case” for helping neuro-divergent people into work, a Conservative former minister has said.

Sir Robert Buckland, who led the Buckland Review of Autism Employment, said employment can provide “fulfilment and happiness” for people on the autistic spectrum.

Sir Robert, whose daughter is autistic, said it was important for him “on many levels” that neuro-diverse people were involved in the report’s findings.

He told MPs: “This had to be a review that was led by autistic people about autistic people. In other words, nothing about us without us.”

...

“So there’s a moral case to be made for the recommendations that are set out in the review, but there’s also, and I make no apology for this, a hard-edged economic case as well. What’s good for autistic people will be good for the rest of our society.”

He added: “Only just under three in 10 autistic adults are in full-time or part-time work. It’s the lowest of all disability classes. That’s about 30% as opposed to 50% for disability generally.”

...

Sir Robert suggested a new approach that was “universal by design” and so would benefit autistic people who did not have a diagnosis or did not feel comfortable discussing a diagnosis with an employer.

He said: “A universal by design approach is going to make the most difference here and we’ve heard a lot over the years about autism friendly environments, and going out of our way to reach out and understand and allow people to explain, but that I think will only have a limited impact, or an impact upon those people who are comfortable and prepared to talk about autism.

“Surely it would be better to have a universal change to the way in which we recruit and retain employees.”

Recommendations in the report include initiatives to reduce stigma and capitalise on productivity, support programmes for autistic people to begin or return to work, and education for employers on working with neuro-diverse staff.

Chair of the Work and Pensions Committee, Labour MP Sir Stephen Timms, welcomed the report but described it as a “missed opportunity”.

He said: “As the review points out, the employment gap is much worse for autistic people than it is for disabled people more broadly.

“A disappointing feature of the report for me though, is the rather unambitious nature of the recommendations. They’re along the lines of ‘the Government ought to try a bit harder on this and do a bit more of that’ there aren’t any targets set out in the report, nothing to really help us to monitor progress.

“So I feel when the question is asked in two or five years time, have these recommendations been delivered? Then the answer is going to be a bit unclear.”

no comments (yet)
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
there doesn't seem to be anything here