this post was submitted on 22 Sep 2023
143 points (95.5% liked)

United States | News & Politics

7117 readers
538 users here now

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
all 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] jordanlund@lemmy.one 39 points 1 year ago (1 children)

"The government shouldn't come between parents and their children!"*

*"Unless the parents are doing something we don't approve of!"

[–] ilickfrogs@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago (1 children)

It's almost like it was never about the children to begin with.

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.one 4 points 11 months ago

It's a common theme:

"We want state's rights!"

"Great, my state wants legal marijuana, gay marriage, safe and legal abortions, and physician assisted suicide."

"No, not like that!"

[–] Kalkaline@leminal.space 31 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Disgusting law. Who does this help? No one.

[–] LeatherRebel@leminal.space 19 points 1 year ago

fuck the usa

[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 9 points 1 year ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


Jessica Burgess, a Nebraska mother accused of helping her teenage daughter use pills to end her pregnancy, was sentenced on Friday to two years in prison.

According to prosecutors, after the pair bought pills to end the pregnancy, Celeste Burgess gave birth to a stillborn fetus.

Jessica Burgess pleaded guilty in July to charges of false reporting, providing an abortion after 20 weeks of gestation, and concealing, removing or abandoning a dead human body.

Although the case occurred before the US supreme court overturned Roe v Wade, it has been seen as a harbinger of how law enforcement may prosecute people for ending their own pregnancies in a post-Roe era – and how giant tech companies could go along with it.

Celeste Burgess was released from Madison county jail earlier this month, after serving a little more than half of her 90-day sentence, local Nebraska news outlet KTIV reported.

Celeste Burgess also reportedly deals with multiple mental health issues and became pregnant due to an abusive relationship.


The original article contains 474 words, the summary contains 167 words. Saved 65%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] ryathal@sh.itjust.works -1 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Before you get the pitchforks, this pregnancy was past the 5 month mark. While the majority are in favor of abortion, this is very close to third trimester abortion which isn't so popular without extenuating circumstances.

[–] thejevans@lemmy.ml 19 points 1 year ago (2 children)

And it got that far because...

I'll bet you my right leg the answer isn't "because they had made an entirely unburdened choice to keep the pregnancy and changed their mind at the last minute."

Pitchforks remain acceptable.

[–] ryathal@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It sounds like there was a lot going on. Attempting to burn and bury the fetus really doesn't help. The article does mention an abusive relationship, which could be justification, but I'd hope if she was literally prevented from getting an abortion for 20+ weeks then this wouldn't be happening.

[–] thejevans@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago

Hope and Nebraska don't usually mix.

[–] Gramatikal@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

The mother helped to induce an abortion past 20 weeks and then they worked together to conceal the remains. Pre-Dobbs, this still would have been illegal. This would have been illegal across most of Europe. Nebraska law at the time put the limit at 20 weeks for an abortion.

She had plenty of time. When we're going into the 5 month territory, you know you're pregnant. They had the opportunity to do this the right way.

[–] hedgehog@ttrpg.network 10 points 11 months ago

[The daughter] also reportedly deals with multiple mental health issues and became pregnant due to an abusive relationship.

[The mother] was set to undergo a court-ordered psychological evaluation ahead of her sentencing. But the evaluation was canceled due to lack of funding

Even if she didn’t try and fail to get an abortion before this point (and we don’t know whether she did), I’m pretty sure that most would agree that this is a circumstance where a late second trimester/very early third trimester should be acceptable.

It was also pretty despicable to cancel the mother’s psychological evaluation because of “lack of funding” and to then sentence her to multiple years in prison.

I’ll keep my pitchfork out, thanks.

[–] Empricorn@feddit.nl 1 points 1 year ago

I didn't initially believe them, but they're absolutely right:

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Late_termination_of_pregnancy