this post was submitted on 15 Jun 2023
6 points (100.0% liked)

KDE & Plasma users

2771 readers
2 users here now

KDE is an international technology team creating user-friendly free and open source software for desktop and portable computing. KDE's software runs on GNU/Linux, BSD and other operating systems, including Windows.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

If not on Wayland, what's stopping you?

top 22 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] JRepin@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I'm on Wayland on all computers. The main pain point I have with Wayland at this moment is the lack of session save/restore (remembering which windows were open and saving their state on logout, and restoring all on login). All of the computers are powered by AMD graphics cards and KDE Plasma desktop.

Yeah, I did not know wayland was lacking this feature until recently when I switched to wayland on my work computer. So long as I know stuff won't be restored, I can plan ahead now.

[–] Fizz@lemmy.nz 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

X because when I try selecting Wayland from sddm the screen goes black and then takes me back to sddm. I'm on manjaro and I've done no configuration and I've not attempted to install Wayland I just assume because it's an option in my drop down that it's been installed.

[–] dylanchapell@kolektiva.social 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

@Fizz @bacteriostat @kde On my arch install, I had to install plasma-wayland-session to make that option work.

[–] Fizz@lemmy.nz 1 points 1 year ago

I had plasma-wayland-session already installed. It turns out I needed to add nvidia-drm to the kernal params and forced GBM backend. After that it seems to be working. I am a wayland man now!

[–] MyNameIsRichard@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm using X because on Wayland windows sometimes disappear from view. I can't even blame Nvidia because I'm all Intel.

[–] bacteriostat@lemmy.one 1 points 1 year ago

That's an unusual issue, have you reported it on bugs.kde.org?

[–] sporif@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Wayland on my ryzen laptop, Xorg on my Nvidia pc. There are just too many things missing with Nvidia, such as Gsync, gamma control, overclocking and fan control.

[–] SSUPII@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

X, because honestly my screen works and don't currently need to replace the server behind it.

[–] bacteriostat@lemmy.one 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I understand and X works fine for a lot od people but do remember the number of developers maintaining it have been dropping year on year. No harm in trying IMO. If you are on Plasma or Gnome, you get a simple switcher on the login screen.

[–] SSUPII@sopuli.xyz 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah, I know X is really showing its age.

I have to add that the switcher is not on Debian 12 by default, where Wayland support for Plasma is optional in plasma-workspace-wayland. Also, it is broken on Nvidia due to missing packages/libraries and Nvidia's proprietary driver still in general not supporting Wayland properly.

[–] Metigoth@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It is bottom left on my sddm login Wayland or X11 session kde. Debian 12 bookworm AMD

[–] SSUPII@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 year ago

Because you installed it, or because 12 now gives both via tasksel (or Debian setup). My system is from Debian 10

[–] Slartibartfast@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

I'm on Wayland on my laptop, which is AMD (I specifically went all AMD because NVidia is just kind of a pain in the ass on Linux I've found) and that works perfectly, it's been my daily driver for probably about a year and I tend to forget I'm even running it unless it comes up, such as talking about it now.

My desktop is Nvidia and that thing will crash if you even say the word Wayland within about 10 feet of it so that one's still rocking X11 for now.

[–] fabhian_arkantos@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

If not on Wayland, what's stopping you?

NVIDIA :(

[–] thenextfrontier@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I use wayland on my laptop running GNOME, and I haven't noticed anything out of the ordinary. I recognize that people's hardware is a big deciding factor on if it works this well or not though...

[–] bacteriostat@lemmy.one 1 points 1 year ago

Yup. I am myself running Plasma Wayland on 2 laptops (both Ryzen APUs) for over an year now. Seems like Nvidia is the biggest limiting factor.

[–] packetloss@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

Currently on X. Mostly because out of the box Wayland doesn't work with my nVidia card. I know there are solutions available to make it work, but I haven't had the time to try them, and honestly X is working just fine for me. Not sure what benefits I'd see by switching to Wayland.

[–] indite@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 year ago

Wayland, I've tried X but it just seems so much slower

[–] LiveLM@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Wayland!
It has advanced a lot lately, I've been daily driving it for months now with no issues, compared to a couple of Plasma versions ago where it would break itself in 5 minutes lol.
Only thing I'm missing is a good remote access solution. I'm currently making do with Sunshine + Moonlight but it has the very annoying bug of not showing the mouse cursor.

Edit: lol just realized this post is 1 month old. Really looking forward to Lemmy fixing this bug.

[–] Efwis@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 year ago

I’m on X atm. Wayland works, but it stops some configs from working properly. For example I have endeavour set up to not only notify me of updates, but I can click on the icon in the tray and it will start the update on X, where on Wayland the tray icon doesn’t show so I have to manually update my system. I like the simplistic click and go the tray icon offers me. This is just one feature I run into problems with. I don’t run NVIDIA so I don’t have the compatibility issue with that.

[–] deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz 1 points 1 year ago

X11 because what we really needed was X12 but instead we threw the baby out with the bath water.

load more comments
view more: next ›