this post was submitted on 18 Jul 2024
29 points (91.4% liked)

Home Video (VHS, DVD, Blu-ray, 4k)

674 readers
25 users here now

On Reddit we have r/dvdcollection, r/boutiquebluray, r/4kbluray, r/steelbook, r/vhs, etc but let's start simply with a community to cover all the forms of home video collecting.

So, do you feel nostalgic for a format? Are you looking forward to a release? Heard any exciting news? Want to show us your shelves? Then post away.

Elsewhere on the Fediverse:

Rules:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Jaws 3 might be the worst 4K ever released as of this very moment. It's that bad and that horribly butchered with AI and awful DNR/Color Timing. The 2D version always looked a bit off due to the way that the film was shot specifically for 3D but with this abysmal 4K transfer it's limitations and issues are blown up and become glaringly obvious. Then on top of that you have AI interperetation the likes not even god has seen.

The film legitimately looks like it was created with Midjourney on more than one occasion. Or entire frames look like the washed out color tone SNL bumpers. Remember those from the 70's and 80's that used to show the host for the night? Entire sequences of the film look like that. No film should look like that in 4K. People look like paper cut outs in more than one frame. This is abhorrent.

Vindicator89 on Blu-ray.com

I said this in another comment thread but will post here too:

The bigger question is why is the upscale suddenly so much worse than it was before?

Plenty of films finished at 2K had 4K UHD discs put out that were nothing more than upscales with HDR grades applied, but they were never this bad. It's like AI upscales became a thing and the studios tossed out whatever previous methods they used, that seemingly worked JUST FINE, in favour of new technology that has GLARING flaws such as this.

/u/adamschoales on Reddit

top 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Dufurson@sh.itjust.works 9 points 3 months ago

blahaj angy grrrrr

[–] JohnOliver@feddit.dk 9 points 3 months ago
[–] hexaflexagonbear@hexbear.net 6 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Wait why are they upscaling? It's from the 1980s so they should have film prints? Are they working from like a 2k DI made for the bluray releases?

[–] ashinadash@hexbear.net 5 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Probably, honestly. Might be the original elements require actual work to rescan and repair, or even that they're lost. 0 effort shit.

[–] hexaflexagonbear@hexbear.net 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Scanning (and fixing) prints is gonna be relatively costly, so I totally get if they want to use the upscale pipeline for random slop. But doing it for Jaws seems kinda crazy. Like Hollywood does not give a fuck anymore.

[–] ashinadash@hexbear.net 4 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Jaws, the proper original got a real 4K UHD release similar to its Bluray a few years back, I think "dogshit Jaws sequels" are random slop tbh.

But also they absolutely do not, who the fuck let Cameron do that to Aliens???

[–] hexaflexagonbear@hexbear.net 2 points 3 months ago

Had a total braindead moment, I even watched that Jaws release lol.

[–] ashinadash@hexbear.net 5 points 3 months ago

Bad upscales of bad movies, lmao gottem.

[–] canis_majoris@lemmy.ca 4 points 3 months ago (2 children)

AI upscaling is probably just much cheaper and easier to do. I mean I do AI upscaling myself. The older Star Trek series that will never get a full Blu-Ray remaster/re-release has copies that have been upscaled from SD to HD and they are pretty flawless, especially considering it's a fan project.

That being said I've also seen the other side of the spectrum, where they AI upscaled King of the Hill and there was a lot of really weird artifacting and stuff going on.

Really sad to see studios just cheap out on high resolution releases. It just makes them look bad in the long run and makes me less likely to buy physical media.

[–] UKFilmNerd@feddit.uk 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I'm confused. Isn't this the original Star Trek remastered in HD with new CGI effects?

[–] canis_majoris@lemmy.ca 3 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Yep! Sure is!

They remastered Star Trek as well as The Next Generation, but claimed that the physical sales did not cover the costs which were purportedly around 10 million for each series.

They opted to not to continue to remaster any of the shows that came afterward, namely Voyager and Deep Space Nine. That's where the fan community picked up the slack and made the AI upscales.

[–] UKFilmNerd@feddit.uk 4 points 3 months ago

Oh I see what you mean! When you say older series, I just assumed you meant the original television show.

[–] wolfshadowheart@slrpnk.net 2 points 3 months ago

Yeah AI upscaling has been around for years, there's phenomenal implementations of it where you legitimately can't tell, and there's godsawful implementations that are thrown together in a matter of 15 minutes, given one pass, and submitted.

Every piece of media I've upscaled (mostly animation) has been great. So far, every upscaled release I've seen posted has been terrible. And yes, it may only have been 2 or 3, but that makes it that much sadder because only 3 movies have been released with upscales and they wouldn't even take the time to do it well.

It's a shame.