this post was submitted on 23 Jul 2023
12 points (100.0% liked)

Privacy

31808 readers
336 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

Chat rooms

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Just saw this article from PCMag and this seems way to good to be true.

top 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] JaxiiRuff@pawb.social 15 points 1 year ago

If its too good to be true it probably is. Could buy a TB or so SSD and be better off doing local backups.

[–] yote_zip@pawb.social 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

WTF is "AI-enhanced storage". Assuming you treat any data uploaded like it could disappear at any time and encrypt your files before upload using e.g. BorgBackup, Kopia, Cryptomator, GoCryptFS etc, it's fine to use it if the price makes sense.

I inherently don't trust a service like this though. If you're not paying a fair price for something, there's probably an ulterior motive. Maybe they're trying to get a proprietary client onto your computer?

[–] Resolved3874@lemdro.id 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Lol yeah I guess that's true. I don't have anything I would want to put in the cloud that I also wouldn't care if it just randomly went away.

[–] yote_zip@pawb.social 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Generally these sketchy plans can be used for redundant offsite backup. If your offsite backup goes down, you can just get a new provider. I've never done it personally, but I know a lot of people use this mentality with e.g. unlimited Google Drive plans, or any other abusive use of hosting services.

[–] Resolved3874@lemdro.id 1 points 1 year ago

Ah now that's actually not a bad idea. Wouldn't be bad for something like that then.

[–] ashtrix@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It also has a 1 gb file size limit according to the article. Lol

[–] Resolved3874@lemdro.id 5 points 1 year ago

lmao. I didn't make it very far into the article but that's probably the biggest way to ensure no one ever uses all their space 😂

[–] Tiritibambix@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I tried a cheap "lifetime" subscription offer a few years back. They're garbage. Period. I'm surprised they're still around stealing people's money.

[–] Resolved3874@lemdro.id 1 points 1 year ago

Appreciate the heads up.

[–] landordragen@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don’t trust them. Too many red flags.

[–] Resolved3874@lemdro.id 1 points 1 year ago

That was my first thought without looking any further than the price 😂

[–] Gargari@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

AFAIK, they limit download, so you need to pay them MUCH more to be able to properly download your files whenever you gonna need them

[–] Resolved3874@lemdro.id 2 points 1 year ago

That's the big catch then, Thank you.

[–] FuckyWucky@hexbear.net 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

oh yea i saw it on stacksocial for cheap. i can't trust any 'lifetime' cloud offering this much storage for so cheap. it does work from what i read but for how long no one knows. good enough for linux isos i guess (or as an encrypted backup for selfhosted storage).

i have koofr 100gb and it works well but look at how much more it costs https://www.stacksocial.com/sales/koofr-cloud-storage-plans-lifetime-subscription-1tb

load more comments
view more: next ›