this post was submitted on 22 Jul 2024
113 points (95.9% liked)

Canada

7187 readers
412 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Communities


🍁 Meta


πŸ—ΊοΈ Provinces / Territories


πŸ™οΈ Cities / Local Communities


πŸ’ SportsHockey

Football (NFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Football (CFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


πŸ’» Universities


πŸ’΅ Finance / Shopping


πŸ—£οΈ Politics


🍁 Social and Culture


Rules

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage:

https://lemmy.ca


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
all 31 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] MapleEngineer@lemmy.world 52 points 3 months ago (1 children)

He's running on empty promises to fix "everything" but never explains how and the main plank in his platform is, "I'm not Justin Trudeau". We can do better. Way better.

[–] danielquinn@lemmy.ca 6 points 3 months ago (1 children)

"Where the hell is the NDP?"

[–] Not2Dopey@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Dead. They are stuck trying to NOT upset the Liberals, for what reason I don't know. If they could start holding the Liberal party's feet to the fire they could actually do something worthwhile. Right now, they are not doing anything.

[–] Icalasari@fedia.io 29 points 3 months ago (3 children)

He's our Trump. Hope our country doesn't make the same mistake as the states did in 2016

[–] SamuelRJankis@lemmy.world 8 points 3 months ago (1 children)

If the polls hold up and the Conservative win people should realize that the LIberal's could have changed things dramatically by implementing Voting Reform but refused to do so.

Specifically the 155/108 Liberal MP's getting paid at least 200k at year and their entire job is to lead this country holds a substantially higher burden then the millions of Canadians who barely spends any effort reading a news headline.

[–] psvrh@lemmy.ca 14 points 3 months ago (1 children)

If the polls hold up and the Conservative win people should realize that the LIberal’s could have changed things dramatically by implementing Voting Reform but refused to do so

They don't care.

If they lose, they know they'll be back in, depending on how bad the Conservatives do, on four to eight years, likely with a majority. Both parties are quite amenable to a periodic chair-switch.

However, if they had put through electoral reform, they'd never get another majority again. They'd have to share power with other, likely left-leaning, parties, which they wouldn't like. It would mean less power, less exclusive access to donations and reciprocation, and the ire of their donor class, who very much don't want to see a goverment that aligns with Canadians instead of the investor class.

The Liberals would ratther lose every seat in parliament than implement electoral reform.

[–] SamuelRJankis@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

That one is going to be on the people. I've encountered a few die hard Liberals here and they're as baffling as a Conservative loyalist.

[–] psvrh@lemmy.ca 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

How can someone be a die-hard Liberal? That's like being a die-hard Wonderbread fan.

If they were the kind of people to get tattoos, they'd read "Milquetoast4Lyfe"

[–] nyan@lemmy.cafe 1 points 3 months ago

That’s like being a die-hard Wonderbread fan.

Terrifyingly, I'm told those also exist.

[–] sik0fewl@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

You mean maybe Trudeau will step down?

[–] Not2Dopey@sh.itjust.works 0 points 3 months ago

LOL! He's too full of himself to do that! He still believes that he can win which is why he didn't do proportional representation or anything good really.

[–] danielquinn@lemmy.ca 13 points 3 months ago

I feel like these are rather tame choices to be honest, though I can't recall anything specific. I just remember hearing him speak in the House years ago under Harper and thinking: "What an odious little man".

Rather than sifting through controversial news headlines, they'd do well to sift through video archives of house debates. I seem to remember racist dog whistles and some pretty terrible things said during the Conservative push for voting "reform" and that Muslim snitch line.

[–] Ulrich_the_Old@lemmy.ca 10 points 3 months ago (1 children)

He was part of the harper government that wanted to raise the retirement age. NEVER FORGET THIS. Also it would be like having trump as PM.

[–] SilentStorms@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Oh damn, this site was put up by the Liberal Party.

Not that I’m against it, but this seems outside their usual messaging. A bit of a peek into how next years election is going to go I guess.

[–] cyborganism@lemmy.ca 11 points 3 months ago

Yeah that's also what I thought. Politics have already become dirty for the past couple of decades since Harper. But now all sides are playing the game.

It's disappointing.

But that's what happens when a whole party gets rock hard everytime they listen to Republicans South of the border.

[–] Perhapsjustsniffit@lemmy.ca 9 points 3 months ago

A literal career politician who says he speaks for the working man. Hahahaha

[–] cheese_greater@lemmy.world 8 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Pierre Poilievre:

::Just renting

[–] villasv@lemmy.ca 5 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Now this is a modern web smear campaign, good work BCLibs.

[–] drewaustin@lemmy.ca 17 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, you never see the Cons trying that sort of thing! Disgusting libs using what a politician actually says and does against them - presposterous!

[–] villasv@lemmy.ca 10 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I guess my tone was a bit dubious, but I wasn't being sarcastic. Good fucking work, I meant it.

The guy is a piece of shit, smear campaigns against him and Rustad are net positive for humankind.

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 10 points 3 months ago

The phrase "smear campaign" has a connotation that the smears are made up or exaggerated. But this is just a list of plain facts about Poilievre.

[–] Oderus@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago

In late March, Poilievre had suggested during a campaign event that digital currencies could help Canadians β€œopt out of inflation” because they are not influenced by central banks.

That's arguably one of his worst comments because he was finance critic under Harper, the master of economics.

Imagine if anyone took his advice then, they'd be broke.