this post was submitted on 24 Sep 2023
-21 points (25.6% liked)

conservative

920 readers
1 users here now

A community to discuss conservative politics and views.

Rules:

  1. No racism or bigotry.

  2. Be civil: disagreements happen, but that doesn't provide the right to personally insult others.

  3. No spam posting.

  4. Submission headline should match the article title (don't cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  5. Shitposts and memes are allowed until they prove to be a problem. They can and will be removed at moderator discretion.

  6. No trolling.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Some mentioned the other one was old. Heres a two-day old article on the same issue.

(page 2) 27 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] breadsmasher@lemmy.world -3 points 11 months ago (16 children)

Why would anyone need more than 10 rounds in a magazine for an assault rifle? “self defense”?

[–] Blamemeta@lemm.ee -1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Why not? No one needs an excuse.

[–] breadsmasher@lemmy.world 0 points 11 months ago (5 children)

Yes. Arm everyone. No excuses. Give everyone rifles with large magazines. What could possibly go wrong in the only country where things regularly go wrong

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] random65837@lemmy.world -4 points 11 months ago (15 children)

Why do you feel people must justify "need"? Aside from the PITA at a range or sporting use which is by far the majority of when people are using them, do you "need" your gas tank to hold whatvit does? Why not hold 5gals and you can simply fill itnup all the time? What does that acomplish other than being a pain in the ass?

Also, AR's aren't "assault rifles". An M16 is, an M4 is, just like your initial argument these are things people say that (sorry), dont know what they're talkig about.

load more comments (15 replies)
load more comments (13 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›