this post was submitted on 07 Aug 2024
26 points (100.0% liked)

Gaming

2345 readers
211 users here now

The Lemmy.zip Gaming Community

For news, discussions and memes!


Community Rules

This community follows the Lemmy.zip Instance rules, with the inclusion of the following rule:

You can see Lemmy.zip's rules by going to our Code of Conduct.

What to Expect in Our Code of Conduct:


If you enjoy reading legal stuff, you can check it all out at legal.lemmy.zip.


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 4 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] sexy_peach@feddit.org 2 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Why are core numbers no longer climbing? I want 32 or 64 cores in consumer chips.

[–] TechnicallyColors@lemm.ee 8 points 1 month ago

Maybe Amdahl's Law is in consideration at this point? Either way, for most consumers there's no need for more cores, and CPUs are made to be sold. I'm guessing at this point gaming performance is one of the most important metrics to differentiate a consumer CPU, so it makes sense that adding more cores is not a priority in that regard.

[–] SoJB@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 month ago

Honestly we could use a swing in the other direction if we’re talking gaming. Half the shit coming out even these days only uses one core, and I bet it’ll get worse as the death spiral of AAA studios continues.

[–] Wahots@pawb.social 1 points 1 month ago

Hmm, no 9800x. Disappointing. There's no way I'm paying $500 for a CPU.